reminder: WIR, MLA, SocAbst index by chapter
|
Footnotes Sources.doc (MSWord working file) chap. 1: fn 2: "I'm not post-feminist," Rebecca Walker explained in 1992, "I'm the Third Wave." fn says: Rebecca Walker, " ", MS 1992 [get issue and page] Walker, Rebecca , "Becoming the third wave," Ms. Magazine 2:4 (Jan-Feb, 1992), 39. fn 4: THIS IS THE HARD ONE: it is the "which women's eyes" quote that I found on a web diary of the Beijing conference 1995. "Beijing Report 3," September 7, 1995 . I think you tracked it down before, but I don't know how to cite it - a web page url? Suneeta Dhar who works with Jagori, a women's resource centre in Delhi.
Nature of the epidemic in the SSWA Region - critical, causes, consequences
and responses. Ms. Suneeta Dhar (as of 1999) HIV & Gender Adviser, UNIFEM, Time: 1:15 behind, 13.5 ahead
chap 2: check edition is correct: Charles Darwin, The Descent of Man and
Selection in Relation to Sex (New York: D. Appleton and Company,
1871), - just need to confirm that my quotes are on pp. 317 and 327
of this edition [I had a copy in a file in office, pretty sure it is
this edition but here is call number to order from SAL]: 575 .D228
Darwin wrote that "Man is more courageous, pugnacious, and energetic than woman, and has a more inventive genius" (301). Man thus attained "a higher eminence, in whatever he takes up, than woman can attain. . ." (311)
I have another request too: can you get Jacquelyn Dowd Hall's book on Jessie Daniel Ames [Revolt Against Chivalry] either from library or bookstore if they have it - Charlotte Hawkins Brown 1920 address to Memphis interracial meeting: JUST BE COLORED FOR A FEW MOMENTS" [93] and Jessie Daniel Ames "tied in to a sex warfare between white and Negro men ..." [248] My revision (and book is on your desk):
note 5. find quote for Mary Astell: "For since
GOD has given t 9/10 John Stuart Mill, The Subjugation of Women - also may be in office - citation for quotes:
--John Stuart Mill, The Subjection of Women, ed. by Susan M. Okin (Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company, 1988.
--John Stuart Mill, Joint Special Committee on Woman's Suffrage (Senate 343, commonwealth of Massachusetts, May 24, 1867) Boston : The Senate, 1869. Accessed 10/13/01 at http://lcweb2.loc.gov/ammem/ammemhome.html **check cite format.. Answer: NO
In process.... To setup the master, open chap1... Edit--Document--include subdoc include a hard page break before
each. Each day working: Open first/master document, then "Edit--Document--Expand master for each of the chapters you want to work on. When finishing, be sure to Edit--Document--Condense master before saving. (double check that). You can also just work on each chapter individually, without opening master. Make sure each chapter has a footnote beginning n umber one... Edit--Insert Foot/Endnote--options--set number Add in "Chapter Two" at end of each chapter for next chapter (Ch.2 written at end of chap 1).
|
| FS101
my updated syllabus: 101SYLLfall01.rtf
|
|
Leftovers: trying to find a missing footnote in chap 7, I FOUND THE 1986 CALIFORNIA POLL THAT INCLUDES THE HOUSEHOLD CHORES missing citation! S.F. Chronicle, feb 13, 1986. It doesn't say source of the poll but i'llcite the newspaper. if this helps find the original poll, let me know, but only if it is not time consuming. The headline is "the new Attitudes of Men and Women" - many questions asked, this was last one. chap 7:14, Find Source: "In one survey conducted in California in 1986, 89 per cent of the men believed that husband and wife should share equally in housework, yet only 44% said that they did share equally." "In a 1978 national survey, Joan Huber and Glenna Spitze found that 78 percent of husbands think that if husband and wife both work full time, they should share housework equally.(Sex Stratification: Children, Housework and Jobs. New York: Academic Press, 1983). In fact, the husbands of working wives at most average a third of the work at home." looks like you have the total number of official delgates but not the number who are female, right? if that is available, figure out the percent, but if not, i'll drop it. re juicy quote: I'd actually rather have something before Beijing for one use, and Copenhagen or Nairobi is just fine, not necessarily Mexico City. journalistic source might give a more vivid personal quote if we are lucky, but an official descriptin could always be livened up in the writing.
"1,300 delegates from 133 governments, 31 intergovernmental and 113 nongovernmental agencies, and seven liberation movements. A parallel, unofficial conference called the Tribune, financed by a number of sources including the Ford Foundation and the Norwegian government, drew an estimated 5,000 participants, most of them feminists from the U.S. and Mexico."But I do want a vivid quote of what the meetings, any of them, were like, preferably not from U.S. or European view. That was why I asked last week about finding a source for un conferences. let me know what you come up with. Good news coverage (including NYT articles) on Lexis-Nexis for Copenhagen 1980 and later conferences, but only two measly articles on Mexico City! forgot to add re chap 6: as of 2000 or 2001, how many nations have ratified CEDAW?Girls speak out : A collection of essays and poems by young African girls as their contribution towards the Fourth UN World Conference on Women and the NGO Forum, Beijing, China, 1995. Imprint: Nairobi, Kenya : African Women's Development and Communication Network(FEMNET), 1995. Requested, but unknown "in process" As of May, 2001, 168 countries - more than two-thirds of the members of the United Nations - are party to the Convention and an additional 4 have signed the treaty, binding themselves to do nothing in contravention of its terms.
Vital Statistics by Country: 2000 and 2010 (Births, deaths, life expectancy, infant
|
| Workpage archives:
eworkjuly2001.html (july 2001: chaps 10-13 data, early FS) ework789 (junejuly 2001womenwork life stories) Also 789stuff.rtf and 789stuff.wpd todo1 (december 2000: mostly pre-FS work) todo2 (november 2000: chap 8, misc. chapters, pre-FS2000 stuff) todosept (sept 2000, misc chapters, some good intl links) |
Randolph E. Schmid, "Housework--Men Do More; Women Do Most," Los Angeles Times 12/2/88, Part 5, p. 3 Men are wielding the mop and tending the stove more often than ever before, yet still doing only half as much housework as women, a new study shows. Women toil about two hours at home for every one hour of housework done by men, reports sociologist John P. Robinson in the December edition of American Demographics magazine. Yet, this represents significant progress in just 20 years, according to the study by Robinson, director of the Survey Research Center at the University of Maryland. By comparison, in 1975 women spent three times as long as men on housework, and in 1965, the ratio was nearly six hours of housework for women for every hour worked by a man. "Several important trends account for shifts in who does how much housework," Robinson reported in his study. These include declines in the share of households with children, a smaller share of married-couple households and an increasing number of women in the paid work force. Robinson compared the housework by analyzing studies of how people spend their time, done in 1965 and 1975 by the University of Michigan and in 1985 by his center. The shift in the housework burden, he found, results from both an increase in the time spent on housework by men, and a decline in the time spent by women. In 1985, Robinson found, men averaged 9.8 hours of housework weekly, while women put in 19.5 hours. The 1975 study found men working 7 hours a week on home tasks compared to 21.7 hours for women. And a decade earlier, men spent 4.6 hours a week on housework, compared to 27 hours for women. Men and women still tended to observe a traditional separation of tasks. Women dominated in such areas as cooking, washing dishes, housecleaning, laundry and ironing. Men, on the other hand, were more likely to concentrate on household repairs and outdoor chores, while the burden of pet care, gardening and bill paying was shared. Things have evened out somewhat, though, Robinson said. For example, in 1965 about 98% of laundry and ironing was done by women, while by 1985 that was down to 88%. Women did 87% of cooking in 1965 and 77% in 1985. Men did only 32% of bill paying in 1965 but increased their share to 52% by 1985. Among the reasons for the change is the decline in the number of households with children, Robinson said. Children mean more cooking and cleaning and other housework, and the majority of that falls to mother. |