Sarah
L. Matics
October
17, 2001
STS
129
Within the Matrix: the Divergence of
Creation and Art
A Matryoshka nesting doll, a
work of Russian folk art in which increasingly tiny wooden dolls emerge from
the hollow cavity of the larger doll encasing them, provides a strikingly
visual analogy to the matrix, or womb,
theory that Paracelsus describes in his Volumen
Paramium between 1530 and 1534. Physician, philosopher, teacher, and
writer, Paracelsus applied the combinative nature of alchemy to his own career,
experimenting within, and indeed contributing to, a budding natural philosophy
rooted in chemical principles and organic, spiritual forces (Conrad 313).
Central to Paracelsus' 16th Century philosophical construct the
matrix theory serves not only as a vital account of human life and development,
but also as a mechanism whereby Paracelsus explores the divergence of creation and art. Constructing the womb as the paradigm over which this
bifurcation of creationism and artistry transpires, Paracelsus genders these
processes and probes the gender roles of the 15th Century God.
For Paracelsus wombs are three in variety,
and all life arises from this vital, moist, and intrinsically feminine organ of
gestation. Water, the surface upon which the "Sprit of the Lord
moved," comprises the initial womb, for "water was the matrix of the
world" (Paracelsus 13). In this maternal womb, writes Paracelsus,
"heaven and earth were created" (23). Then, much like the Matryoshka
doll, "heaven and earth each in turn became a matrix," in which God
forms Adam, following Adam's creation with the creation of woman, the eternal
womb. Thus, "woman" then
became "the maternal womb of all men" (24). According to Paracelsus
the woman and the womb are equivalents, for he describes, "Woman is
enclosed in her skin as in a house, and everything that is within it forms, as
it were, a single womb" (24). The shell of the female secrets the womb
within the bodily interior, the microcosmic and unseen world of man: the
"inner firmament" (25). Paracelsus' fascination with the occulted
womb, as well as his mystic sense of the "invisible" matrix (13)
resonates with his descriptions of medicinal practice. A physician only becomes
a physician "when he knows that which is unnamed, invisible, and immaterial"
(64). Recognition of a disease, coursing hidden throughout the inner walls of
the body, remains the trademark of the physician’s ability to heal.
Indeed
with great care Paracelsus measures the demarcation between the interiority of
the human body and the natural world surrounding man. Skin, the supple covering
of the body, "delimits the shape of the human body, and through it [man]
can distinguish…the Great World and the Little World, the macrocosm and the
man" (17). Enclosed within the tender film of skin resides man, the Little
World. Without: the macrocosm: the cosmos, the whole of life and the extent of
creation. Dividing enclosed private internal mechanics of the human
body and the external, observable, and knowable natural realm coincides not
only with Paracelsus' classification of particular diseases but also with the
methods by which, according to Paracelsus, a physician may apprehend and treat
a disease. To understand health, claims Paracelsus, a physician, for example,
"must know that there are more than a hundred, indeed more than a
thousand, kinds of stomachs" and that "consequently, if you gather a
thousand persons, each of them will have a different kind of digestion"
(87). Such specification of the organ within each initial man--- and thus the
necessary particularity both of the disease and of the treatment distinct to
each---hardly facilitates standardized treatments for afflictions; rather the
differences among organs that perform similar functions require the physician's
ability to read, decipher, and thereby interpret the symptoms and
manifestations of the disease. In
knowing "the customs, peculiarities, and nature of [the patient's]
country" (89), a physician must also contextualize the disease. Just as
maladies reveal their differentiation in the form of external symptoms, so too does "everything external in
nature point to something internal" (91). Even the essence of the Great
World and the Little World "are distinguished only by the form in which
they manifest themselves, for they are only one
thing, one being" (19). The
Great World and Little World for Paracelsus are thus two sides of the same
coin, yet thin skin between these
realms nonetheless serves to dislodge total unification of, and
interpenetration between, them. Symptoms are indeed not the disease itself but merely indications of the malady;
likewise the Great World represents and allows one to understand the workings
of the Little World, the inner firmament of man. If such external
representations are to become symbols and symptoms of the internal world, then
surely the process of apprehending the internal realm is one of collecting
these distinct signs and assembling them into a series of coherent meanings.
Art is this very process of combining and interpreting and originates within
the function of the womb.
Paracelsus
assigns the womb two main tasks: combining parts into wholes and serving as a
place of gestation in which the mother's imagination shapes and modifies the
fetus. Primarily the womb combines the "seed of man and the seed of
woman" (27). For example "the seed from the man's brain and the seed
from the woman's brain make together….one brain" (27). In this depiction
of conception a pair of seeds comprises each distinct bodily component. Paracelsus
further explains:
When the seeds of all
members come together in the matrix, this matrix combines the seed of the head
with the seed of the brain…putting each in its proper place, and thus a single
member is place where it belongs, just as a carpenter builds a house from
pieces of wood (27).
First combining each pair of seeds into a single
body part such as a brain, a head, or an arm, the womb then assembles these
parts into a whole fetus. In this second stage of production the womb
constructs like a carpenter, fitting parts together into a coherent, functional
form. Yet if the womb participates in
combinatorics, so too does the God of which Paracelsus conceives. Though
Paracelsus genders God as male, nonetheless he ascribe to God's psychology a
womb-like desire to combine parts into whole. God, asserts Paracelsus,
"wills to make out of two, and not out of one; he wills man composed of
two and not of one alone" (28). God's wish, therefore, is to combine the
seeds of two people, a man and woman, and from those seeds to produce one
human, the child. Thus the Paracelsian God, while physically male and in
possession of the male seed that fathers heaven and earth within the watery
first matrix (13), nonetheless embodies the intention and volition of the
inherently feminine matrix.
This
deistic transsexualism arises not only from the symmetry of God's will to
combine and the womb's function to assemble, but also from the capacity for
imagination that God and woman share. Paracelsus declares that "the
imagination of a pregnant woman is so strong that it can influence the seed and
change the fruit in her womb in many directions" (32).. With each mental
image the mother conceives, she exercises moral power upon the developing child
concealed within her womb while determining "the health and sickness of
the body" (32). The mother, then, retains ethical responsibility for the
physical integrity of the child she bears. Paracelsus confirms, "Even
while in the womb, unborn, man is burdened with the potentialities of every
disease" (76). Thus the mother's cognitive conceptions obligate the health
of the conception within her to hearty or frail constitution. Recalling the
emphasis Paracelsus places upon the idea of the external revealing the
internal, the child becomes at birth, and remains throughout its life, a
reflection of the mother's private, internal thoughts.
In
similar manner did God imagine, at the node of worldly creation, conceiving of
objects---land, animal, and man---not existing prior to His shaping of them.
The formative capacity of the womb mirrors the conceptualizing powers of the
transsexual God; again the mental forces of the Paracelsian God identify with
those of the mother. This faculty of imagination is a creative, as opposed to
artistic, authority. If "the world is as God created it" (14), then
God brought into existence a terrestrial and spiritual system in a method alike
to the means by which the mother brings the physical aberration or wellness of
her child into permanence. The imaginative faculty therefore an inherently
creative one, both God and the mother possess an uniquely generative power.
Though one could argue that the mother has no faculty to imagine outside of those aspects of the world which,
through God’s creation, already exist, yet the process of her imagination creates, and affects, the heath of her
child directly; she creates within the Little World a quality that did not
exist before her imaginative process occurred.
If
the creator imagines, the artist combines. In the Paracelsian framework, creation
prefigures art. If "God has
created art" and "has entrusted this art to man" (127), then art
is, like the clay of earth, a part of God's enclosed system. Though "a
potter is able to make a thousand different things from clay" (14), he
remains incapable of making the clay itself. Of combining the parts of God's
world into familiar, or even unfamiliar forms, the artist's inspiration and
vocation consists; creationism, however, remains inaccessible to man. As
Paracelsus assets: "There is nothing left for anyone to create because
everything was adequately created [by God]" (15). Thus the production of
new wholes from parts---such as the building of a palatial estate from wood
rough hewn---must be a corollary of creation. Art as a process naturally follows
creationism, stirring within the Little World
sensual impulse to embody the powers of the divine Creator.
Yet
art is not creation, and man therefore continuously against limits vigorously
pushes. The Little World plays at the "necessary" and "indispensable"
art of alchemy (144) exemplifies the process of art. Like the artist of
metaphor who from two unlike ideas creates a single meaning through their
combination, and like the womb from whom two seeds makes a unified person, so
too does the alchemist combine chemicals and heat to "transmute all things
from one form into another" (Newman 326). Paracelsus combines putrefied
sperm and heat within the horse's womb, attempting to beget the homunculus
(Newman 328). The "transparent" and bodiless homunculus" recalls
Paracelsus' fascination with both the unseen and the ability of the invisible
womb naturally to produce what the limits of human art cannot achieve: viable
life. Subversion of the matrix, with God at center, is but translucence. Not
even a shadow, not even a wisp of vapor as the chemicals combine in heat, the
little man nonetheless embodies the ultimate Little World; for he is the
metaphor combining the hope of man to create with the inability in the
Paracelsian system to achieve that end beyond art. He is the symbol of a man
who lacks skin and natural limit, yet the consequence is incorporeality.