All posts in HD in the Media

A Review of “The Lion’s Mouth Opens”

Photo Credit to Lucy Walker Film

Photo Credit to Lucy Walker Film

Initially Released: 2014
Publicly Available: June 2015
Run length: 28 minutes

“I’ve always felt like I don’t have it”.
This sentence is how Marianna Palka, both subject and producer, begins the new documentary The Lion’s Mouth Opens. This short documentary, directed by Lucy Walker, known for The Waste Land and The Crash Reel, tells Palka’s story of deciding to undergo genetic testing for Huntington’s disease. At just 28 minutes, an expansion from the initial 15-minute version that was premiered at the Sundance Film Festival, The Lion’s Mouth Opens brings viewers into Palka’s circle of friends as they bear witness to her decision to know her HD gene status. The film begins with Palka hosting a dinner party for close friends the night before finding out the results of her genetic testing. As the story continues, viewers are given an insight to Palka’s life, specifically her experience with her father’s HD progression and the impact on her family. The dinner party scenes are interspersed with interviews of Palka, her mother, and Palka’s friend Jason Ritter, as well as home-movies from Palka’s childhood. These scenes seamlessly take readers back and forth between the community space of the dinner party and the painful past of Palka and her mother. The last 10 minutes of the film are dedicated to the hospital visit, and the reactions of Palka and her close friends as they discover her gene status.

As an autosomal dominant disorder, Huntington’s disease in one parent gives every child a 50/50 risk of having the gene mutation that results in HD. Despite this coin-toss statistic, only about 5-10% of those at-risk choose to undergo genetic testing. As one of the few, Palka’s decision to share her genetic testing experience in the form of a documentary is a valuable addition to existing HD literature and film. In her early 30’s and non-symptomatic, Palka expresses disbelief that her gene status is simply a 50% chance. Although the science says the odds are 50/50, for Palka it does not feel that way. The subtlety of this distinction is an important one for clinicians, caregivers, and advocates to consider in regards to genetic testing. For those at-risk, 50/50 is much more than a number, and in no way as simple as the flip of a coin. Palka describes the difference between gene-positive and gene-negative as two completely diverged roads with no middle option. Down one road is a death sentence and down the other is the ability to be “just like everybody else”.

There are many factors that go into an individual’s decision to be genetically tested, including his or her age, family situation, and personal ability to cope with the information. This makes the process of genetic testing a very complicated one, involving multiple appointments as well as counseling. The entire process takes at the very minimum one month, but typically longer. More information on the process of genetic testing can be found here. In addition, issues of confidentiality, discrimination, and the effect on personal relationships are all implicated in an at-risk individual’s decision to discover their HD gene status. As a result, one’s decision to be tested or not is an intensely personal one, and with both options the at-risk individual needs as much support as possible. This level of support is made clear in the dinner scene with Palka and her friends as they share the night and their care with her. During dinner Ritter expresses that, “we’ll all still be here tomorrow and we’ll all still love each other as much as we love each other now.” The Lion’s Mouth Opens shows how difficult it is to go through the process of genetic testing even with an extremely supportive circle of friends and family.

Another theme that The Lion’s Mouth Opens brings up is the nature and implications of Huntington’s disease as a familial disorder. Palka’s father became symptomatic when she was only 8 years old. Palka describes those years of her life as though going from a paradise to hell. Although her father is still alive, he is now a “ghost” of his past self. Palka and her mother describe the disease as cruelly and randomly taking certain members of the family, a genetic “Russian roulette”. For the Palka family, Marianna’s father, sister, and two cousins have all been taken as victims. Towards the end of the film Palka ruminates on the fact that she, her sister, and her cousins — with whom she has shared everything her entire life — may also share this burden of HD. The familial nature of HD often means that there can be multiple symptomatic individuals at one time. This results in an incredible amount of stress and strain on every aspect of a family’s life — emotionally, socially, and financially. Those family members that are early-stage or at risk may be forced to also play the role of caregiver for a late-stage relative. In addition, gene-positive and at-risk individuals must consider decisions around reproduction. Some may already have at-risk children, others may choose to undergo fetal testing, and others may abstain from having children. Reproductive issues and decisions around them are incredibly sensitive and must be addressed with compassion and understanding on the part of family members, friends, and healthcare providers.

A key and intriguing component of The Lion’s Mouth Opens is its title. The phrase comes from a poem titled “Last Thoughts on Woody Guthrie,” written by Bob Dylan for Woodie Guthrie, who died due to complications of Huntington’s Disease and was a long-time inspiration of Dylan’s. The poem itself is about 5-pages long and can be found here. Palka is able to recite the poem verbatim and does so in the film as a series of video clips of individuals affected by HD plays. This moment, about half way through the film, is an emotionally charged one as it brings together visual images of the experience of HD with the powerful lyrics of Dylan’s poem.

This film touches on genetic testing and the familial nature of HD, in addition to several other themes. Despite its range, the film manages to engage deeply with each topic while simultaneously connecting viewers with Palka’s story. Films such as The Lion’s Mouth Opens, which was aired on HBO during HD Awareness Month(June 2015), are essential tools in the continued struggle for widespread HD awareness. Awareness helps decrease discrimination against those affected with HD, and can also help increase research funding for better treatments and hopefully, a cure.


Find Local Resources through the HDSA
Film Website
Information on Genetic Testing
Resources for youth affected by HD

CJE 07/16/2015


HD in Scrubs

In the season 8 finale of Scrubs, a popular medical TV show, one of the doctors diagnoses a 70-year-old woman with Huntington’s disease. While manifestation of the disease is more common during middle age, presenting symptoms later on is possible. JD, the physician on the show, does his best to explain the disease in a manageable, understandable way without neglecting to mention that the patient’s son, Mr. Stonewater, is also at risk for this genetic disease. JD offers Mr. Stonewater the genetic test that would reveal whether or not he had inherited the same faulty gene as his mother. Mr. Stonewater asks for some time to consider his options.

JD goes through the rest of his day fazed, as he knows how devastating the disease is and how difficult a decision it is whether or not to pursue genetic testing. When Mr. Stonewater informs JD that he does not want to take the test, JD respects his wishes.



The son, Mr. Stonewater, had told JD that his mom wasn’t acting like herself. When JD tries to examine her she lashes out and accuses him of trying to attack her. JD comes back later with a diagnosis.


Stonewater: She has Huntington’s disease?

JD: It’s a degenerative brain disease, causes you to lose control of your movement and mental ability. It can also change your personality like with your mom.

Stonewater: So what do we do?

JD: Unfortunately, there’s no cure. Eventually it will take her.

Stonewater: Oh geez.

JD’s internal monologue: Sometimes, you just have to barrel through no matter how much it sucks.

JD: And Mr. Stonewater, Huntington’s is caused by a faulty gene. And since your mother has it, you have a 50/50 chance of having it too. We can test you for it if you want.

Stonewater: If we find out that I have it early on, are there any treatment options?

JD: Nothing substantial yet. I can only tell you if you have it, can’t even tell you when the disease would hit you if you do have it. Could be in your 70’s like your mom or…

Stonewater: Could be sooner.

JD: Could be sooner. I’m so sorry.

Stonewater: Can I have a few minutes?

Next scene:

JD internal monologue: I’m so bummed about Mrs. Stonewater that I totally spaced and forgot what was wrong with Benjamin here. Is he the one with broken ribs? Nope. Maybe he’s the guy with sinus polyps. I don’t think there’s any polyps but he definitely has some oily skin issues. I should turn him on to that awesome apricot scrub I stole from Elliott. Come on, focus!

Next scene:

In an argument with Elliott, a fellow hospital employee and JD’s girlfriend

JD: NO, Elliott. I’m upset because Huntington’s disease sucks, Dr. Cox is a jerk and I’m such a crappy doctor I just got dumped by a patient. And nobody but you and Turk care that I am leaving.

Later, JD encounters the patient in the hallway as he explores the challenges of offering the genetic test for Mr. Stonewater.

JD’s internal monologue: Sometimes it’s deciding that you don’t want to know if you have a fatal disease.

Stonewater: Dr. Dorian, I decided not to take that test.

JD: Ok.

(JD walks away from the patient in a haze of his own internal monologue)

End scene

In this case, it is unusual for a doctor to recommend the genetic test without explaining the formalities that accompany it—genetic counseling, psychiatric and neurological evaluations as well as a blood draw. These aspects of genetic testing, along with the risks—discrimination, insurance spikes, depression, etc.—were probably not included in this episode due to the nature of the show (entertainment versus documentary). We would like to clarify that doctors should always explain the full process of genetic testing before offering it, especially if someone has only been recently introduced to the disease. Other than the exemption of these facts, JD does not misinform Mr. Stonewater about his genetic risk or the fate of his mother and explains the facts clearly and succinctly.

However, as you can see from JD’s internal monologue, genetic testing can be a complicated decision even for the medical professionals. Genetic counselors, neurologists, and psychiatrists all work together to determine a patient’s ability to handle an HD genetic testing. They must consider the ramifications of the test and the results potential impact on the health of the patient, which might include risk of suicide or depression. These professionals often face great stress upon the reveal of the results, as they are all too aware of the implications of the test. We can see the type of strain this places on JD as he emphasizes with Mr. Stonewater’s tough predicament.

Within the context of a medical drama TV series, this episode overall accurately portrays the difficulties for the patient, the family, and the physician involved in dealing with the realities involved in dealing with the delivery of an HD diagnosis.

KP 2014





HD in ER

*ER is a medical drama television series*

In the Season 9 Episode “Insurrection,” a late-stage Huntington’s disease (HD) patient is rushed into the Emergency Room (ER). The ER is in chaos during this episode, as doctors and nurses walkout to protest unsafe working conditions. Inside the hospital, the absence of staff makes it easy for the desperate mother of the patient to switch off the ventilator that is supplying life to her son. To her, this action is probably one of mercy, as she knows her son’s life will never get better.


When Dr. Lewis discovers what the mother has done, she decides not to press murder charges in order to protect the mother from prison.


Background: The ER receives a patient with end stage Huntington’s disease. He fell out of bed and potentially broke his hip.

ER doctor: What do we know?

Another doctor: Huntington’s, starts in your early 30’s and 40’s starts with your emotional ability and depression, leads to a progressive loss of motor control and loss of cognitive function.


Later: The patient is having sudden troubles unrelated to his hip. His mother is there. She apologizes to him for the quality of the nursing home and says it was the best she could find. She doesn’t have much money to pay for quality care. The mom keeps pointing out how much her son is suffering and begs the doctors to help him. Later on, he chokes on vomit and they want to put in a tube despite scars in his pathways from a ventilator a few months ago. The mom asks “That’s it right? When you put that tube in, it’s not coming out, right?”


Later: The patient needs to go to the operating room. The mom asks Dr. Susan Lewis if she knows what it is like to watch someone die for 25 years.



Mother: It’s what I did with his father every day. I loved the man, but I hated what it did to him.

Doctor Susan Lewis: I can refer you to another nursing home. I don’t know what you are paying now.

Mom: He was a singer, didn’t you know? An opera singer, a tenor? When he sang, it was the most beautiful sound in the world. I prayed it would pass him over. When he got to be 29, I thought, my God maybe we got lucky. Then he started having trouble at work. Forget things and when he talked sometimes he was hard to understand. And of course…of course he couldn’t sing anymore. It just takes everything away. Everything.


Next scene: During the walk out in which many of the doctors are protesting unsafe working conditions, the mother turns off her son’s ventilator. Doctor Lewis comes back in and turns on the ventilator to prevent suspicion. She hides the patient’s true cause of death in order to protect the mother.


ER is intended to be a medical drama. In its effort to emotionally influence viewers, ER often neglects to explore the ethical implications of the characters’ actions. In this episode a distraught, desperate mother watches her son suffer as the doctors attempt, not to cure or treat his symptoms, but extend and hopefully improve his quality of life.


The mother has been a caregiver for a long time. She had to care for her husband until he passed away, and her son as well. She expresses the difficulty of watching a loved one lose the ability to do things he or she enjoys like opera singing, in her son’s case. This episode shows the challenges facing caregivers and the emotional burden resulting from decades of caring for those affected by the disease.


This episode highlights end-of-care controversies for HD patients such as death with dignity or assisted death. There are currently only three states that have Death With Dignity Laws–Washington, Vermont and Oregon. These laws allow mentally competent, terminally ill adult state residents to hasten death using prescribed euthanasia medication.1 This choice is complicated one for the HD community; Qualifications such as “mentally competent” might be defined in various ways among physicians, patients, and family members as HD does cause cognitive and psychiatric issues.


Suicide or assisted suicide are major issues in the Huntington’s disease community. In fact, suicide is often the leading cause of death among those who have inherited the mutant gene. Because of the gravitas of these actions, it is extremely important that health care providers do all they can to understand the psychological impacts the disease has on the individual as well as family members. In addition to health care providers, caregivers and family members should be well-educated on what to do if their loved one is experiencing suicidal ideation.


Dr. Lewis did not follow proper procedure upon discovering what the mother had done. She altered the cause of death to avoid focusing any suspicion on the mother. Dr. Lewis neglected to follow protocol in order to protect the mother from legal ramifications. While this might be an exception a doctor would make in a TV drama, it is not something that should be expected of any physician. Patients and caregivers should have an open dialogue with primary care doctors to discuss end-of-life options such as “Do not resuscitate” (DNR) or preventing the use of feeding tubes.


The subject matter in this episode of ER is very heavy. It highlights the burden on caregivers and why family members might consider options such as assisted suicide. If you are a Huntington’s disease caregiver, you can find resources and support networks by visiting


Works Cited

  1. “Defend Dignity. Take Action.” Death with Dignity National Center. N.p., n.d. Web. 11 Aug. 2014.

KP 2014


Breaking Bad

Breaking Bad is a popular U.S. crime drama television series that aired from 2008 to 2013. The main character, Walter White Jr., discovers that he has inoperable lung cancer and decides to sell methamphetamine in order to secure his family’s financial future when he passes.

In an episode titled Salud, Walter’s son is celebrating his 16th birthday. Unfortunately, Walter is less than able to celebrate with him due to various self-inflicted medical problems. The next morning, he sits his son down to tell him about a childhood memory that has always haunted him.

The Dialogue

Walt: My father died when I was six. You knew that right?

Son: Yeah.


He had Huntington’s disease; it destroys portions of the brain, affects muscle control, leads to dementia, it’s just a nasty disease. It’s genetic. Terrified my mother that I might have it so they ran tests on me when I was a kid, but I came up clean.

My father fell very ill when I was four or five. He spent a lot of time in hospitals. My mother would tell me so many stories about my father. She would talk about him all the time. I knew about his personality, how he treated people, I even knew how he liked his steaks cooked, medium rare, just like you. I knew things about my father. I had a lot of information. It’s because people would tell me these things. They would paint this picture of my father for me. And I always pretended that that was who I saw too, who I remembered. But it was a lie. In truth I only have one real actual memory of my father.

It must have been right before he died. My mother would take me to the hospital to visit him and I remember the smell in there. The chemicals: it was as if they used up every single cleaning product they could find in a 50 mile radius, like they didn’t want you smelling the sick people. Oh, there was this stench of Lysol and bleach, I mean, you could just feel it coating your lungs. Anyway, there lying on the bed, is my father. He’s all twisted up. My mom, she puts me on her lap, sitting on the bed next to him so I could get a good look at him, but really…he just scares me. And he’s looking right at me, but I can’t even be sure that he knows who I am. And your grandmother is talking, trying to be cheerful, you know, as she does. But the only thing I could remember is him breathing. This rattling sound like if you were shaking an empty spray paint can…like there was nothing in him.

Anyway, that is the only real memory that I have of my father. I don’t want you to think of me the way I was last night. I don’t want that to be the memory of me when I am gone.

Son: Remembering you that way wouldn’t be so bad. The bad way to remember you would be the way, the way you’ve been this whole last year. At least last night you were real, you know?


While it is great that Breaking Bad is introducing millions of viewers to Huntington’s disease, there is always a risk of misinformation or stereotyping in entertainment media. In this episode, the most glaring mistake is the comment Walter makes regarding his genetic testing for the disease.

Walter stated that his mother was so scared of Walter Jr.’s at-risk status; she had tests run on him when he was six years old. However, the historical timeline is skewed. In order to test for Huntington’s disease prior to symptom expression, an individual must undergo genetic testing. However, predictive genetic testing was not available until 1993 after Nancy Wexler’s team discovered the location of the gene that causes Huntington’s disease. As Walt is middle-age, it is not possible that he was expressing symptoms of Juvenile Huntington’s Disease as individuals with this disease often don’t live beyond their 20’s.

In the episode, Walter notes that he tested negative for the disease when he was a child. However, genetic testing had only been available for about 15 years. If Walter had been able to test before his sixth birthday, he would have to be no older than 21 years old, assuming this episode took place in 2008. Walter is a middle-age adult with a 16-year-old son so there is no way genetic testing would have been possible at the time he said it was.

Forgetting, for a moment, that genetic testing was not feasible when Walter was a child, coercive genetic testing is another topic that was glossed over quickly within the dialogue. In the United States, it is strongly recommended that genetic counselors only test individuals over 18 years old or legal adulthood. There are a variety of reasons why this recommendation is in place. In respect to Breaking Bad, it would prevent parents, such as Walter’s mother, from testing at-risk, non-symptomatic children without their legal consent. Children are thus protected from discrimination from their parents (intentionally or not) as a result of their test outcomes. Additionally, it is the affected individual’s right to decide if he or she wants to know, which is why parental coercion is highly discouraged.

In this episode, it is clear that Walt has traumatic memories of his father. Unfortunately, for many children in Huntington’s disease families, childhood can be filled with hardship as many parents become symptomatic at this time. While resources for children dealing with the issues associated with living in an HD family were limited to non-existent when Walt was a child, there are many resources today for children including the Huntington’s Disease Society of America (HDSA) National Youth Alliance and the Huntington’s Disease Youth Organisation (HDYO).

While this episode of Breaking Bad does contain major inaccuracies in terms of genetic testing, it does highlight the impact HD can have on children who watch their parents live with the disease.

KP 2014



HD in Twitch: The Documentary

This documentary follows 18-year-old Kristen Powers as she undergoes the process of genetic testing for Huntington’s Disease. The documentary premiered at Stanford University on February 21, 2014. More information about the film and its screening schedule can be found at

In the documentary Twitch, filmmaker Kristen Powers tells the story of her own journey with Huntington’s Disease and her decision to get tested for the HD gene. The documentary walks audiences step-by-step through the genetic testing process, starting with Kristen sharing her family’s history with HD and ending with her receiving the test results that will reveal whether or not she carries the gene for the disease that claimed her mother’s life at the age of 45.

The film, which has a run time of slightly under 45 minutes, contains a series of interviews with Kristen’s friends and family members, as well as a series of video diary entries from Kristen herself. These vignettes provide insight into some of the emotions experienced by individuals and families affected by HD. Twitch also contains many photographs and home videos of Kristen’s mother, Nicola, that provide viewers with a glimpse into her life before and after being diagnosed with HD. The footage reveals Nicola’s awkward gait, one of the first signs that led the family to realize something was wrong, and includes scenes from the nursing home where she spent her final days.

In addition to sharing the Powers family’s personal HD story, Twitch also features interviews with several others with family histories of HD, and is careful to provide examples of at-risk individuals who, like Kristen, have chosen to get tested alongside the stories of those who have chosen to refrain from testing. The documentary makes it clear that the decision to undergo genetic testing is a deeply personal choice, and that an at-risk individual’s autonomy and decision should be respected. Twitch also contains an interview with, and a look into the life of, an individual who has been diagnosed with HD, thereby providing audiences with an opportunity to see what it means to be symptomatic.

The documentary also does a fine job of maintaining medical accuracy throughout. Interviews with several medical professionals, including a neuroscientist who walks viewers through a series of graphics that discuss the science behind HD inheritance and the huntingtin protein, are present throughout the film and are an accurate depiction of our current understanding of HD.

The one thing that viewers should be aware of when watching the film is that Kristen’s genetic testing process was accelerated for the purposes of the documentary. Those who watch the film may notice that the time between her appointments seems to go by fairly quickly, so it is important to note that while specific procedures vary between testing centers, there can be a waiting period of several weeks in between pre-testing appointments. Other than this, however, Twitch does a good job of providing its viewers with a look into what it means to be a member of a HD family, and what the process of genetic testing is like. The documentary is factually accurate, and doesn’t make any exaggerated claims about HD.

Disclosure: Kristen Powers is a Stanford University student and a HOPES student researcher. However, Twitch is a completely independent project of Kristen’s that is not affiliated with HOPES, and Kristen played no role in the writing of this article.

R. Reddy 2014


HD in the New York Times: "The DNA Age – Facing Life with a Lethal Gene"

This article was published on March 18, 2007 on the front page of the Sunday edition of The New York Times. The full article can be found here.

In 2007, the Sunday edition of the New York Times had a circulation of approximately 1.6 million. This meant that on Sunday, March 17 of that year, millions of readers across the world were introduced to Huntington’s disease (HD) by the front page article that was titled “The DNA Age – Facing Life with a Lethal Gene.”

The article, which ran at nearly 5000 words long, told the story of 23-year-old Katherine Moser, who had just tested positive for the gene for HD. Moser first became aware of the fact that HD ran in her family when her great uncle was diagnosed with the disease. Her own maternal grandfather began showing symptoms at the age of 50, but Moser’s mother refused to get tested, despite the fact that two of her sisters did (one sister tested positive and the other tested negative).

In the article, Moser explains that her mother did not want her to get tested either because if she tested positive, that meant that she must have inherited the gene from her mother. So Moser’s test results had implications not only for herself, but for other members of her family as well.

Eventually, after completing college and distancing herself from her mother, Moser made the decision to be tested at Columbia University Medical Center in Manhattan, and found out that her “CAG number” was 45, thereby indicating that her body contained the altered form of the huntingtin protein and that she would eventually start showing symptoms of HD.

Moser goes on to live life with the knowledge that she will eventually be developing HD. She actively chooses not to get married, works toward paying off her student loans as quickly as possible, and does what she can to seek support and teach others about HD. The article details her journey.

Despite only focusing on one individual who has yet to show the symptoms of HD herself, this New York Times article is fairly medically accurate in its description of the disease. The article provides a brief but factual description of HD as a trinucleotide repeat disorder by stating that on the fourth chromosome, “the letters of the genetic alphabet normally repeat C-A-G as many as 35 times in a row. In people who develop Huntington’s, however, there are more than 35 repeats.” It does, however, fail to mention the nuance that while individuals with 40 or more repeats do have the altered huntingtin protein, outcomes vary for individuals with 36-39 copies. However, this technicality doesn’t really come into play since it is revealed that Ms. Moser has 45 repeats.

With respect to maintaining medical accuracy, it is also important to note that while the article and the quotes contained in it refer to HD as the gene or disease that will kill Ms. Moser and other members of her family, medically speaking most people with HD do not die as a direct result of the disease. Rather, they tend to pass away from problems that arise as a result of the degenerative effects that HD has on the body. HD patients tend to die from an inability to fight off medical conditions such as infections and pneumonia.

The article does, however, do a good job of properly describing HD symptoms in a way that makes sense to the general public. Rather than using terms such as chorea to explain the uncontrollable movements that can manifest during the onset of HD, the article simply states that HD causes “cell death in the brain, leading Huntington’s patients to jerk and twitch uncontrollably and rendering them progressively unable to walk, talk, think and swallow.”

As mentioned above, in addition to medical aspects of the disease, the article delves into living with the knowledge of being positive for HD, and how that affects an individual’s decision making. Moser describes the various emotional stages that she went through after receiving her test results, including anger and an inability to face HD patients at the nursing home where she worked, but she makes it clear that she does not regret making the decision to get tested. However, the article does not make light of the genetic testing and explains to readers that choosing to get tested is a serious decision, and it is revealed that Ms. Moser was required to attend genetic counseling sessions and see a psychiatrist before getting tested.

Another important aspect of the article is that it discusses the family planning issues that arise after HD is diagnosed. Moser comments on how difficult she finds dating to be now that she knows she will develop HD in the future and she even mentions seeing a therapist who tells her that it is her “moral and ethical obligation not to have children.” This statement by her therapist is unfair and biased, and the article does touch upon that, mentioning that there are now new reproductive technologies, such as prenatal diagnosis and preimplantation genetic diagnosis, that can allow couples to ensure that their children will not have HD. However, options such as adoption, surrogacy, and sperm donation are not discussed.

Overall, the article provides an effective overview of life with HD for the general public, and serves its purpose in educating the masses about both the medical and lifestyle aspects of HD.

R. Reddy 2013


HD in the Media

Welcome to our Huntington’s Disease (HD) in the media section of the HOPES website!

Despite the fact that many people are not completely aware of HD and how it works, the disease has become one of the favorite “dramatic diseases” of mainstream news media and the entertainment industry. References to HD in popular culture include, but are not limited to, books (as evidenced by our site’s Literature Corner), television shows, films, radio programs, and newspaper articles.

The purpose of this section of our website is to approach all depictions of HD in the media with a critical lens media outlets often dramatize their depictions of medical conditions in an attempt to draw in viewers and readers. Symptoms are portrayed as much worse than they are in reality, incorrect diagnoses are provided, and false information is presented to audiences around the world.

To correct these misconceptions, members of the HOPES team will be going through various depictions of HD in the media to determine what aspects of HD are presented properly and what aspects are misrepresented. This section includes a synopsis of the media’s depiction of HD as well as a discussion of whether it was realistic and medically accurate.

While there are instances in which the popular media can be a helpful and accurate source of information, we hope this section of the site will remind you that is important to be cautious when obtaining your facts from these sources.

Feel free to use the site’s Contact Us form to provide us with the names of television episodes, movies, documentaries, etc. that you would like to see reviewed for this section.

1. HD in the New York Times

2. HD in Scrubs

-R. Reddy, 7-10-13