Michael J. Rosenfeld
|
Note: This is my homepage, which I maintain myself. The
information here is the most up-to-date. The sociology department
website also has a profile of me, but the information there is not
the most current.
Research Interests:
I am
a social demographer who studies race, ethnicity, immigration, and
family structure, especially family structure changes over time.
My current research agenda focuses on alternative family forms of
racial intermarriage and same sex cohabitation in the U.S., and
on the reasons for rising incidence of these alternative family
forms. See the description of my book, The Age of Independence,
below.
I am currently working on three new projects:
1) A study
of the development of children of same-sex couples, based on data
from the US Census, the CPS, and Add Health.
2) How Couples Meet and Stay Together,
a revolutionary study of social life in the US, funded by the National
Science Foundation. The first wave of the study was fielded in 2009.
Public data, documentation, and further information is available
at the Stanford
Library's data distribution website. A paper
with initial findings on how couples meet is now available.
Links to news coverage about the "How Couples Meet" study
is below, under prior media coverage.
My
current academic CV is here,
in PDF format.
My
current research
statement is here.
A Password
Protected family page is here
|
Selected Scholarly Publications (PDF format):
|
Modified April, 2009
|
|
M. Rosenfeld. 2007. THE AGE OF INDEPENDENCE: Interracial Unions,
Same-Sex Unions and the Changing American Family. Harvard University
Press. Available now
from Amazon.com. You can also find the book, along with a selection
from the text and the index, at the Harvard
University Press website.
The Age of Independence
is a book which offers a new theory of family trends and social
change in the US. The argument revolves around the independent life
stage, a life stage which has emerged since 1960. Young adults experience
the independent life stage after they have left their parents' homes,
but before they have settled down to start their own family. During
the independent life stage young men and women go away to college,
travel, begin careers, and enjoy a period of relative social independence.
The rise of the independent life stage
has reduced parental control over the dating and mate selection
choices of their children. The decline of parental supervision and
control results in a sharp rise in interracial and same-sex unions,
the kind of unions that previous generations of parents were able
to prevent. Although most Americans and many scholars believe that
young adults are returning home to the parental nest in ever greater
numbers (a phenomenon the press has dubbed 'the boomerang effect'),
this widely held perception has it exactly backwards. In fact what
really distinguishes modern family life from previous eras is the
new independence (geographic, residential, and social) of young
adults from their families of origin.
|
 |
|
Until
very recently, individual level census data from the past had never
been available for scholarly analysis. What we knew about family
life in the past came from diaries, from the official records of
a few towns and churches, or from travel writers such as Tocqueville.
Now that we have individual level census records from 1850 through
2000, we are able to look into long term trends in family life in
a way that inevitably must cast some of our previous assumptions
aside. I use the newly available census data to describe the rise
of the independent life stage, and the sharp increase in the number
of interracial and same-sex unions in recent years. My analysis
of census data offers a new explanation for why the tumult of the
industrial revolution failed to produce an increase in nontraditional
unions: most families in the industrial revolution moved to cities
and factory towns together, so the basic structure of parental supervision
over young adults was maintained.
By placing the post-1960 family changes
in a long term historical and demographic context, I am able to
offer a new perspective on the dramatic recent diversification in
American family forms. I use in-depth interviews to explore the
life histories of families and couples, and to illustrate the role
that the independent life stage plays in social change.
Same-sex marriage is one of the most
divisive issues of our times. My book attempts to answer several
questions related to same-sex marriage. First, why now? Why has
the climate for gay rights in the U.S. changed so much in the past
few years? Second, what next? What do the historical precedents
and current demographic trends portend for the future of same-sex
marriage in the US?
The independent life stage has implications
beyond the rise of nontraditional unions, which after all are still
a small minority of all couples in the US. Because parents raise
their children with their future independence in mind, parents raise
their children differently, and these differences affect how we
all think about individual freedoms.
Information for the Press, and prior media coverage:
Related Figures
and Data:
* A figure
and worksheet describing
the increasing percentage of American couples that are interracial,
by several definitions of interracial.
* A figure
and worksheet
describing the increasing number of interracial and same-sex couples
in the US.
* A figure
and worksheet
describing the decreasing support in the US for laws against interracial
marriage.
PRESS Attention
for the book:
*KGO Radio San Francisco, David Lazarus
show, 1/20/2007
*Chicago Tribune, cover story, "A
Cultural Taboo Fades" on the rise of intermarriage, March
11, 2007
*USA Today, "Boomerang
Generation Mostly Hype," on the growing independence of
young adults, March 14, 2007.
*Featured on NBC national nightly
news with Brian Williams, in their series on the "State of
Our Unions," March 29, 2007, see the story
and the video here. The video seems to work better with IE than
Firefox...
*USA Today, "Free
as a Bird and Loving It: Being Single Has Its Benefits,"
April 12, 2007
*AP National News, picked up by many
papers including the Seattle Post-Intelligencer, "Interracial
Marriages Surge Across the US" April 13, 2007, another
link is here.
*WAOK talk radio Atlanta, Shelley
Wynter show, April 13, 2007
*Kieran Healy, blogging
at Crooked Timber has some lovely things to say about my book
and about the age of independence, and about David Brooks' typical
misunderstanding of the independence of young adulthood.
*KZSU radio Lunch Special show, hosted
by Byrd, July 2,2007, interview (a
13 minute section of the hour long show, in mp3 format, 4.5MB).
*I was a guest on Jefferson Public
Radio's Jefferson
Express show on October 5 (link provides audio files for the
last 10 episodes only...)
*I was quoted in a cover story in
the Sunday Oregonian, Sept 23, 2007, titled "Marriage Today:
Fewer I do's and more just I's," but no web link is currently
available.
*I was quoted in a December 14, 2007
story in The
Indian Express, about intermarriage and Indian-Americans.
*I was the September 13, 2009 guest
on KALW's Sunday morning Philosophy
Talk show, talking about the postmodern family.
*On the subject of Barack Obama and
multiracial America, I was cited in an
interesting story by Charles Lewis in Canada's National Post,
June 7, 2008. Obama's electoral success so far means this particular
conversation about race and multiraciality will continue. In the
New York Times coverage of Barack Obama's inauguration, in the January
21 2009 edition, Jodi Kantor wrote an interesting story
about Obama's multiracial ancestry, which quoted me.
*In recognition of the 40th anniversary
of Loving v. Virginia, the 1967 Supreme Court decision which ruled
all state bans against interracial marriage unconstitutional, there
were several stories, including:
*Washington Post, Love
is Colorblind, June 9, 2007
*Stanford Report, "Nontraditional
Unions got boost from Changing Family Structure, Sociologist Says,"
June 13, 2007
*The Virginian-Pilot, "Mixed-Race
Marriage Gained Legal Status in Virginia 40 Years Ago,"
June 10, 2007
*If you have a print
edition of the July, 2007 Cosmo, you'll find me on page 27.
*In memory of the
May, 2008 passing of Mildred Loving, one of the litigants in Loving
v. Virginia, syndicated columnist Clarence
Page wrote a nice column which cited me and which makes the
relevant connection between the debate over same-sex marriage today
and the legacy of Loving v. Virginia.
*The evidence shows
that same-sex couples do a perfectly fine job raising children.
These couples need all the rights and recognition and obligations
of marriage. See my
June 19, 2008 Op-Ed in the Sacramento Bee. See also my paper
on "Nontraditional Families and Childhood Progress Through
School."
PRESS Attention
for the "How Couples Meet" study:
* USA Today, a nice
story
by Sharon Jayson on friends, the Web, and How Couples Meet.
Feb 11, 2010.
* Stanford Report, a
feature story on How Couples Meet, with video. Feb 11, 2010.
* San Jose Mercury News, "Growing
Number of Singles Find Their Valentines Online," Feb 14,
2010.
|
|
Other Scholarly Publications:
|
|
M. Rosenfeld, 2009. "Nontraditional
Families and Childhood Progress Through School."
Forthcoming in Demography.
* Because this paper
is the only paper in the literature which compares children raised
by same-sex couples to children raised by other types of families,
using large sample nationally representative data, this paper's
results were discussed in depth during the hearing phase of Perry
v. Schwarzenegger, Federal district court 2010 (the case which puts
the constitutionality of the anti-gay-marriage Proposition 8 on
trial). See link
to transcript of day 5 of the trial here.
|
M. Rosenfeld, 2008. "Racial,
Educational, and Religious Endogamy in Comparative Historical Perspective",
Social Forces volume 87, issue 1, pages 1-32 (lead article).
Links to typeset version (electronic access necessary) at Project
Muse and Gale.
* In the front
matter of the journal, p.ii, Editor Francois Nielsen wrote the following:
"Occasionally I run across papers that not only present original
results but also have the scope, theoretical depth and integrative
quality to function as an effective review of an entire subfield.
A good example is the article by Michael Rosenfeld in this issue."
|
M. Rosenfeld. 2008. "Intermarriage."
In the Encyclopedia of Race, Ethnicity and Society, Edited
by Richard T. Schaefer, pages 736-739. Sage Press. Copyright 2008
Sage Press, reprinted here with permission. |
M. Rosenfeld. 2006. "Young
Adulthood as a Factor in Social Change in the United States."
Population and Development Review 32(1) 27-51.
(Copyright 2006, Population Research Council, Reprinted with Permission). |
M. Rosenfeld and Byung-Soo Kim. 2005 "The
Independence of Young Adults and the Rise of Interracial and Same
Sex Unions" was the lead article in the American Sociological
Review 70 (4):541-562. The paper is also available through
this external link to Ingenta.
Also available are supplementary
tables for the paper, describing the the method for making 1990
and 2000 census samples of same sex couples more consistent, as well
as providing expanded tables of coefficients for some logistic regression
models summarized in Table 7 of the paper. Email me if you want a
copy of this paper. This paper was summarized and described as 'new
and noteworthy research' in the Fall,
2006 edition of the sociology journal Contexts, p. 11. |
M. Rosenfeld. 2005. "A
Critique of Exchange Theory in Mate Selection." American
Journal of Sociology 110 (5) 1284-1325 (Copyright 2005, University
of Chicago Press, reprinted with permission). Additional tables, figures
and addenda for the paper are available as a separate appendix here.
The dataset
used in tables 3-5 of the paper is posted here as an excel file. This
paper was the winner of the 2006 Roger V. Gould memorial prize
for the best paper in the AJS in the previous year. |
M. Rosenfeld, 2002. Measures
of Assimilation in the Marriage Market: Mexican Americans 1970-1990
Journal of Marriage and the Family 64: 152-162 (copyright
2002 by the National Council on Family Relations, 3989 Central Ave.
NE, Suite 550, Minneapolis MN 55421. Reprinted with permission) |
M. Rosenfeld, 2001. The
Salience of Pan- National Hispanic and Asian Identities in US Marriage
Markets Demography 38: 161-175.
(Copyright 2001 Population Association of America, Reprinted with
permission) |
M.
Rosenfeld, and M. Tienda, 1999. "Mexican Immigration, Occupational
Niches and Labor Market Competition: Evidence from Los Angeles, Chicago
and Atlanta, 1970-1990" Chapter 2 in Immigration and Opportunity:
Race, Ethnicity and Employment in the United States Edited by
Frank D. Bean and Stephanie Bell-Rose. New York: Russell Sage.
There are two ways to get this chapter: you can buy the book from
Russell Sage (search their website for publications here)
or you can Email me and I'll send you a PDF file. |
M. Rosenfeld, 1997. Celebration,
Politics, Selective Looting and Riots: A Micro Level Study of the
Bulls Riot of 1992 in Chicago. Social Problems 44 (4):
483-502. (Copyright 1997
Society for the Study of Social Problems. Reprinted with permission) |
Working Papers (PDF format):
Classes I teach:
Soc 26 N |
"The Changing American
Family," a freshman seminar |
Fall, 2006 |
Soc 46 N |
"Race and Ethnic Identities,"
a freshman seminar |
Fall, 2009 |
Soc 155/255 |
"The Family/ The
Changing American Family" |
Fall, 2009 |
|
Syllabus
Questions
for each reading assignment.
What is expected of in-class and in-section presenters
in-class
presentation schedule
Rosenfeld section
presentation schedule
|
| |
Legal Decisions relating to contraception and
abortion:
*Griswold v
Connecticut, US Supreme Ct 1965 (the first supreme court ruling
that famously cited individual privacy rights, struck down Connecticut's
law which prevented even married couples from purchasing birth control).
*Eisenstadt
v Baird, US Supreme Ct 1972 (struck down a Massachusetts law
which had prevented unmarried persons from accessing birth control,
thereby expanding the Griswold decision).
*Roe v Wade,
US Supreme Ct 1973 (guaranteed abortion rights and forced all 50
states to legalize first trimester abortions, and second trimester
abortions with some limitations).
Sodomy Cases:
*Bowers
v Hardwick, US Supreme Ct, 1986 (upheld Georgia's anti-sodomy
law).
*Lawrence
v Texas, US Supreme Ct, 2003 (reversed the Bowers decision and
struck down Texas's anti-sodomy law, and by extension all the state
laws against sodomy).
Marriage Cases:
*Loving
v Virginia, US Supreme Ct 1967 (struck down Virginia's law against
racial intermarriage, helped establish marriage as a fundamental
right, and by extension made all the state laws against interracial
marriage unenforceable).
*Turner v
Safley, US Supreme Ct 1987 (found, among other things, that
prisoners had an inalienable right to marry).
*Baehr v
Miike, Hawaii trial, 1996 (the first trial of same-sex marriage
rights where the state had to meet a high standard of evidence for
why they wanted to deny same-sex couples the right to marry; the
court's decision was a victory for same-sex couples).
*Baehr v
Miike, Hawaii reversal after state constitutional amendment,
1999 (after the state of Hawaii passed a constitutional amendment
to make same-sex marriage illegal in Hawaii).
*Baker
v State, Vermont, 2000 (the decision that forced Vermont to
adopt same-sex union rights for gay couples).
*In Re
Gardiner, Kansas, 2002 (the decision that voided that marriage
of Gardiner and Ball because of Ball's previous sex change).
*Goodridge
v Dept Public Health, MA 2003 (the decision that forced Massachusetts
to adopt full marriage equality for same-sex couples).
*Varnum
v Brien, Iowa 2009 (the decision that has brought marriage equality
to Iowa).
The Three California same-sex marriage cases:
*Lockyer
v. San Francisco, California 2004 (ordering San Francisco to
stop marrying same-sex couples and nullifying the marriage of same-sex
couples at San Francisco city hall until the court could rule on
the constitutionality of California's same-sex marriage ban).
*In
Re Marriage Cases, California, 2008 (deciding that California's
same-sex marriage ban was inconsistent with California's constitution,
forcing the state to allow same-sex couples to marry)
*Strauss
v Horton, California 2009 (acknowledging the legality of Proposition
8, which amended the California constitution to redefine marriage
as only between a man and a woman, but the decision also upheld
the legality of the same-sex marriages performed in California in
2008).
|
|
First draft of potential
final exam questions (updated for Spring 2009)
First draft of potential
midterm questions (updated for fall 2009)
Midterm
grade distribution Fall 2009
Preliminary Instructions
for the GSS paper project (updated Nov 3, 2009)
Some Additional Relevant Links:
Judith Stacey's "Good
Riddance to the Family"
David Popoenoe's "Two-Parent
Families Are better"
Moynihan's 1965 Report on "The
Negro Family"
A 1995 US Dept. Health and Human Services Report on Unmarried
Childbearing
A 2003 US Census report on Marriage
and Cohabitation
An international comparison of Non-Marital
Fertility Rates
Smith, Morgan, and Cox
paper on Nonmarital fertility
Ruggles paper
on history of black family structure
Two graphs to get you thinking
about life course versus historical and cohort effects, from the
2000 CPS. Mean
income by age and gender, and mean
education by age and gender.. Figures for health
status by age are here.
|
|
|
Soc 388 |
Loglinear Models |
Fall, 2007 |
|
Syllabus
First homework assignment,
due Oct 9
Second homework assignment
due Oct 18, see the links page for the dataset.. Homework
3 (due October 30) is here, see class notes on how to download
the data. I have also posted instructions
for the abstract and final paper (NOTE updated due dates and instructions).
|
|
Link
to class notes, datasets, and (eventually) homework solutions |
|
Soc 149/249
Urban Studies 112
|
"The Urban Underclass"
|
Winter, 2010 |
| |
Questions
for the Assigned Readings
What is expected of in-class and in-section presenters.
In-class presentation schedule: Goldring, March
4.
Study guides for the exams, based on last year's
exams:
Sample midterm questions (updated
for 2009)
midterm grade
distribution 2009
And even more relevant, the midterm
grade distribution for 2010
Sample final exam questions (updated
for 2009)
Moynihan's 1965 report, The
Negro Family: The Case For National Action, published by the
US Dept. of Labor (PDF file, 4MB).
Links to reports on HOPE VI, the 1990s housing
policy which included tearing down the worst high rise public housing
projects:
A Brookings
Report by Turbov and Piper
An Urban
Institute/Brookings report by Popkin et al
A Critique
by Venkatesh and Celimli
An Urban Institute brief
report by Buron
An Urban Institute brief
report by Popkin, Eiseman, and Cove
Links to reports on Moving
To Opportunity
Two terrific undergraduate student theses from
recent years that I will refer to in the class.
1) Kelsey Finch's Trouble
in Paradise: Postwar History of San Francisco's Hunters Point Neighborhood,
copyright 2008 Kelsey Finch.
2) Jackelyn Hwang's Perceptions
and Borders of the Changing Neighborhood: A Case Study in Philadelphia,
copyright 2007 Jackelyn Hwang. For citation or use outside of Soc
149/249/ Urb 112, you must get permission from Jackelyn
Hwang.
Links relating to welfare reform:
See various working papers from the Three
City Study including Andrew Cherlin's paper, "The
Consequences of Welfare Reform for Child Well-Being"
See also Cherlin et al 2002, paper
from Social Service Review (accessible to Stanford students
only)
And see also Rebecca Blank's thorough summary
and evaluation of welfare reform.
Robert Moses's response
to Caro's biography of him.
Some overheads from class are replicated
here, so you don't have to copy them down. Introduction
to some of the basic ideas in the class. A figure on transitional
neighborhoods and neighborhood turnover, based on the game theory
analysis of American economist Thomas Schelling. Timelines:
Chicago time line, and Civil
Rights time line. Notes on Marxist
views of history. Outline
of the Culture of Poverty ideas. My notes
on neighborhood effects, and an illustrative simulation
(in pdf format; an excel version that is easier to play with is
here) of
what the segregation indices mean. My notes
on different causes of segregation are here. Further notes on the
effects of segregation.
My notes on free market economics and mortgage lending are
here. A pdf figure which describes gerrymandering
and reverse gerrymandering (and a powerpoint version of the same
gerrymandering slides).
Two excellent maps of Chicago, prepared by Victor Thompson, are
now available. There is the neighborhood
map (especially useful as a companion to Hirsch's book), and
the map of Black residential
concentration. Two graphs
of black-white income differences are here.
How progressive is the US Income
tax (in theory)? See the history
of marginal tax rates.
Weblinks with more up-to-date information
about residential segregation in the US (links open in separate
windows) with thanks to students Ashley Daly and Katherine Lee.
* A Census Bureau report, "Racial
and Ethnic Residential Segregation in the United States: 1980-2000"
* The
Lewis Mumford Center, with various reports on segregation.
* The
Civil Rights Center at Harvard University.
* Stanford's CCSRE has various
reports on local diversity and segregation.
Student notes:
|
Soc 180B/280 B |
Evaluation of Evidence
|
Winter, 2010 |
| |
Guidelines
for the Soc 280B presentation and proposal.
Soc 280B presentation schedule (proposal due to
Rosenfeld by email one week before presentation)
Mar 4: Paige, Siri
Mar 9: Qinglian, Alice
Mar 11: Alexis
Guidelines
for working together on home work
My notes on
research terminology and types of bias are here. This page will
be undergoing regular revision during the class, so be sure to check
back. Newly added: my notes on the
mean, the variance, and simple statistics (these notes under
construction). An
Excel file on means and standard errors (will be updated). Freedman's
statistical
distribution tables from the back of the book. My notes on what
changes and what doesn't change in regression when you change
the inputs.
Final
Exam Preview is ready.
Project 1, Historical/ Archival:
Information: Some
notes on potential topics and library resources at Stanford.
Notes on how to read
sources, and guide for project 2 proposals.
Some additional helpful hints
about how to write the historical paper.
Project 2, Quantitative Data
Analysis
Key materials:
*The dataset for HW 1, and most of the rest of the homeworks is
the 2000 March CPS
dataset (14MB, Stata 10 version). Right-click
to download the data files. I include here some housekeeping
procedures I have done to the March CPS file which may helpful
to you when you work with your own CPS files.
More relevant stuff for the quantitative data project
(links repeated from above):
*mean,
the variance, and simple statistics
*
Excel file on means and standard errors
* Freedman's statistical
distribution tables
* what
changes and what doesn't change in regression when you change
the inputs.
My own brief
Introduction to STATA, contains lots of key information.
* The first assignment for the quantitative part of the class is
HW1. HW1
Answers are now available.
* As part of HW 1, you will be required to
register
with ipums CPS, and download a dataset of your own
*
HW 2 assignment. HW2
Answers and supplementary Excel
file now available.
* HW3
assignment is now available.
* HW4
assignment is now available, datasets for HW4:
Anscombe's data (Excel format) and a 50-state
CPS dataset (Stata format).
A link for CPI
inflation data.
:The variables and their descriptions
are best located at the website www.ipums.org,
where the data come from. You will find that ipums is easy to navigate
and has lots of relevant information. You can register for free
and create your own dataset. For class purposes, I will be using
* ipums
variable descriptions for CPS
* and ipums
introduction to the CPS methodology
Rosenfeld's 2010 class logs
* First
class log (a first look at labels, creating new variables, tabulate,
weights)
*
Second class log (using table, weights, cross tabulations, reading
in datasets)
*
Third class log (table and ttest)
* Fourth
class log (includes ttest, commands for the Normal and t-distribution,
as well some additional material posted after the class to introduce
regression and the unequal variance t-test)
*
Fifth class log (on ttest, regression, and dummy variables with
some additional stuff posted after class about how to use xi for
multiple categories)
* Sixth
class log (with extended notes on what regression results mean,
on dummy variables, and on using desmat to generate the dummy variables)
* Seventh class, no log, see the Excel file
* Eigth
class log (log just about taking t-tests with random sub-samples.
Mostly we talked about What
changes and what doesn't change in regression).
* Ninth
class log (we talked a lot about predicted values of regression
models, and when the predicted values will and won't coincide with
the actual real data that we use to create the models).
Rosenfeld's 2010 section logs
*
First Section Log (some basic intro stuff)
*
Second section log (on categories, tabling ranges, codebook)
* Third
section log (generating the median)
* Fourth
section log (on using regress and desmat with categorical and
continuous predictor variables)
* Fifth
section log (on updating Stata and more on predicted values.
See also class nine and my Excel file).
Additional and supplementary Information for
the quantitative data analysis project:
* In case you need it, but you probably
won't, A multiyear
CPS dataset, in zipped format (37MB Zipped, 95MB when expanded,
Stata 10 version). Here is a link to the ipums
codebook for the CPS data extraction I used (the 2000 data is
just a subset of this multiyear extraction).
Purchase Stata here. You should
be buying Stata/IC 11, perpetual license which comes with the Getting
Started Manual, for grad plan price of $179:
http://www.stata.com/order/new/edu/gradplans/gp-campus.html
My
notes on how to match husband to wife or householder to partner,
to create couples data, using STATA and census data from ipums.
Two graphs to get you thinking
about life course versus historical and cohort effects, from the
2000 CPS. Mean
income by age and gender, and mean
education by age and gender. A log
for the creation of the graphs is here. Figures for health
status by age are here, embedded with commands and notes.
* Materials relating to a famous debate about the
influence of outliers. 1) Jasso's
original article on coital frequency. 2) Kahn
and Udry's critique. 3) Jasso's
response.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archives of 2009 Stata class logs (note that the 2009 Stata
logs were all generated in Stata ver 10)
* Class
1 Stata log (summarize, tabulate, weights, March 2000 CPS);
Class
2 Stata log (table, cross tabulation, generate, labels); Class
3 Stata log (first introduction to t-test and regression, see
also my notes on means and variance, and my Excel file on statistical
comparisons above); Class
4 Stata log (more on regression, with and without weights, and
on the Normal and T distributions); Class
5 Stata log (dummy variables, random subsets); Class
6 Stata log (equal and unequal variance T-statistics, and generating
probabilities from T-statistics and Z scores); Class
8 Stata log (how regression changes or doesn't change when the
inputs are changed); Class
9 Stata log (a bit on interactions, dummy variables, and plotting
lines and scatter plots); Class
10 Stata log (brief introduction to logistic regression, also
residual plots and dfbetas);Class
11 Stata log (a bit on predicted values and additivity)
Archives from 2009 Rosenfeld section logs:
Section
1 (incl also generate, and labels); Section
2 (some fun with tables and box plots and histograms); Section
3 (more on regression and dummy variables, plus ttest to P value
conversion, plus desmat as an alternative to xi); Section
4 (some very unhelpful box plots of income by age, and a procedure
for tabling the means and then capturing them over to Excel);
Section 5 (some more about graphing Anscombe's data); Section
6 (a brief note or two about graphing on the 50 state dataset)
Download
a pdf version of the documentation (~1.94 MB), and the March
2000 CPS dataset
itself (~9.5MB, Stata 8 version, but does not have all the nice
labels nor all the variables of the above version)- Note: if your
browser tries to display rather than download this file, try control-click
for Mac or right-click for windows). New: a pdf version of the official
explanation of the methodology
of the CPS (~2.2MB- don't print this- it is many hundred pages long).
Also, you will find that the online documentation at ipums is more
helpful anyway. A brief tour
(old) of the 2000 CPS variables, without all the variable labels
from ipums.
|
Soc 180/280 |
"Introduction to Social
Research"
Note: This class has been superseded by Soc 180B/280B
|
Spring, 2004 |
| |
Project 1, Historical/
Archival: Information: Notes
on how to read sources, and guide for project 2 proposals.
Some additional helpful hints
about how to write the historical paper.
Project 2, Ethnography: Some guidance
about what the proposal
for the first project should look like. Guidelines for the first
project paper. Some key
terms from Goffman.
|
|