Charlie’s Angels vs. Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon
Jenny Herbert

Charlie’s Angels and Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon both present female characters that are empowered by their physical strength, self-reliance, and power to protect themselves. The two films treat the sexuality of their heroines differently, however: in Charlie’s Angels, the Angels use their sexuality to empower themselves by performing typically patriarchal stereotypes of women, thus denying the female characters agency over their own sexual expression; in Crouching Tiger, the young female fighter’s agency allows her to express both her physical and mental power and her sexuality on her own terms, and shows her empowerment to be the source of her sexual agency.

 

These observations might lead one to conclude that the feminist messages in Crouching Tiger are more complete and authentic than those in Charlie’s Angels. That conclusion would be premature without an examination of the factors that could be attributed to the different portrayals of women’s sexuality in the films. In this paper, I will first describe in more detail each film’s treatment of its heroines sexuality and sexual agency; then, I will analyze the differences in genre and in cultural that might explain this disparity between the two films' representations of their characters. This analysis will reveal that although these two factors can explain some of the differences, ultimately the representations of the Angels give them less sexual agency than do the representations of Jen in Crouching Tiger.