|
1
|
- Stephanie Potter and Andrew Wood
|
|
2
|
- Watkins a controversial filmmaker using innovative techniques
- Based on events at Hiroshima, Nagasaki, Hamburg, Dresden, and, Darmstadt
- Watkins based initial feelings on photographs
|
|
3
|
- Prepared through interviews (scientists, civil service, etc.) and
scientific fact
- Combined fact and fiction
- British government refused to provide help, only help was through Kent
fire services for firestorm scenes
|
|
4
|
- Completed in 1965
- Meant to be aired on television during anniversary week of Hiroshima
bombings
- Banned from British television—contradicted official British position on
nuclear survivability
- Aired on TV for first time in 1985
- Shown in cinemas from 1966 onward through ban loophole
- Awarded “Best Documentary Feature” at 1967 Academy Awards
|
|
5
|
- Expose inadequacy of Civil Defense program
- Lack of education for general British population (Effects of bomb;
handing out safety pamphlets at the last minute)
- Portrayal of effects of nuclear attack
- Evoke pathos and sentiment against nuclear weapons
- Set in an idyllic part of Britain
|
|
6
|
- Less than three minutes warning time
- Problems with evacuation to countryside
- Inability of population to afford and adequately build bomb shelters
- Immediate intense heat (“melt the upturned eyeball”)
- Firestorms
- Mass chaos
|
|
7
|
- Massive casualties
- Destroyed economy
- Simple threat: Four years to fully recover
- Actual attack: All of attack area/20% of “safe” areas rendered
uninhabitable
|
|
8
|
- General apathy toward life
- Disregard for law
- Hunger riots
- Killing of security forces
- Anarchy
- Euthanasia
- So traumatic no amount of therapy would help
- Health effects
- Radiation poisoning
- Leukemia
- Scurvy from lack of nutrition
- Children
|
|
9
|
- Discusses problems of using nuclear weapons
- Threat of growing stockpiles and proliferation
|
|
10
|
- Which parts do you think were real statistics and accurate
interpretation vs. exaggeration meant to evoke strong emotions?
- If an attack did occur, there would be a strong public outcry for
retaliation: how would the government respond? Would they be locked into
a series of mutual retaliations?
- Watkins used both statistics, civilian interviews and potentially “real
life” footage to make his points. Which depictions were the most
effective and why?
|
|
11
|
- The War Game
- “The War Game Revisited” http://picpal.com/peterwatkins.html
- IMDB Information on The War Game—http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0059894/
- Others
|