•Which parts
do you think were real statistics and accurate interpretation vs. exaggeration meant to evoke strong emotions?
•
•If an attack
did occur, there would be a strong public
outcry for retaliation: how would the government respond? Would they be locked into a series of mutual retaliations?
•
•Watkins used
both statistics, civilian interviews and
potentially “real life” footage to make his points. Which depictions were the most effective and why?