|
1
|
|
|
2
|
- High Confidence that Iraq was “expanding its chemical, biological, and
nuclear programs”
- Claimed Iraq could produce a nuclear weapon within a year of gaining
fissile material
- Claimed that Iraq would “probably have a nuclear weapon during this
decade”
- Pointed to aluminum tubes, magnets, and high speed balancing machines as
evidence that Iraq was seeking HEU (highly enriched uranium
- Claimed that Iraq was purchasing fissile material from African states;
British and American governments pointed to Nigeria as a supplier
- US Department of State and Energy disputed estimates
|
|
3
|
- According to IAEA, “no indication of resumed nuclear activities…nor any
indication of nuclear-related prohibited activities at any inspected
sites.”
- No evidence of imported uranium
- Iraq’s nuclear capabilities “deteriorated substantially” since 1991,
according to the IAEA
- Refuted CIA estimate that aluminum tubes were applied toward uranium
enrichment
|
|
4
|
- David Kay: “We have not uncovered evidence that Iraq undertook
significant post 1998 steps to actually build nuclear weapons or produce
fissile material.”
- Imported uranium allegations untrue: according to former ambassador
Joseph Wilson, “it was highly doubtful that any transaction had ever
taken place.” The Bush
administration admitted that the accusation should not have been
included in the 2003 State of the Union address
- Kay did note that Iraq did preserve some pre-1991 technology
- According to Kay, there was interest in early 2002 to resume and
enrichment program, but this did not lead to illegal activities
|