Infinite resolution
We may reasonably claim that the next integer after $4$ is $5$. What
is the next real number after $\pi$?
The notion of consecutive numbers doesn't quite make sense for
$\mathbb{R}$. The real number line has a sort of "infinite resolution":
for any real numbers $a < b$, there is a real number $c$ such that
$a < c < b$.
This is a third issue.
Fix a base $\beta \geq 2$ and integers $p$, $m$, and $M$. The
floating point system (FPS) $\mathbb{F}(\beta, p, m, M)$
is the set of all combinations of the form
\begin{align*}
\pm \bigg(\sum_{n=1}^{p} d_n \beta^{-n}\bigg)\times \beta^e,
\end{align*}
with each digit $d_n$ in $\{0, 1, \ldots, \beta -1\}$, and some
integer exponent $m \leq e \leq M$.
Elements of an FPS are called floats.
Why floating?
In any FPS the point floats, literally.
Consider the following elements of an FPS with base $\beta = 10$ and precision $p=4$:
\begin{align*}
0.1234 \times 10^{{\color{var(--emphColor)} -}{\color{var(--emphColor)} 2}} =& 0{\color{var(--emphColor)} .}001234 \\
0.1234 \times 10^{{\color{var(--emphColor)} 1}} =& 1{\color{var(--emphColor)} .}234 \\
0.1234 \times 10^{{\color{var(--emphColor)} 4}} =& 1234{\color{var(--emphColor)} .} \\
0.1234 \times 10^{{\color{var(--emphColor)} 8}} =& 12,340,000{\color{var(--emphColor)} .}
\end{align*}
Changing the exponent $e$ moves the decimal point: it
floats to where we need it!
Let's take a closer look...
\begin{align}
\pm \bigg(\sum_{n=1}^{p} d_n {\color{var(--emphColor)} \beta}^{-n}\bigg)\times {\color{var(--emphColor)} \beta}^e = \pm (0.d_1d_2\ldots d_{p})_{{\color{var(--emphColor)} \beta}}\times {\color{var(--emphColor)} \beta}^e
\end{align}
The base $\beta$ controls the number of digits available:
each $d_n$ is taken from the set $\{0, 1, \ldots, \beta - 1\}$.
Let's take a closer look...
\begin{align*}
\pm \bigg(\sum_{n=1}^{{\color{var(--emphColor)} p}} d_n \beta^{-n}\bigg)\times \beta^e = \pm (0.d_1d_2\ldots d_{{\color{var(--emphColor)} p}})_{\beta}\times \beta^e
\end{align*}
The precision $p$ determines expressiveness of the system; the
maximum length of any digit string.
Let's take a closer look...
\begin{align*}
\pm \bigg(\sum_{n=1}^{p} d_n \beta^{-n}\bigg)\times \beta^{\color{var(--emphColor)} e} = \pm (0.d_1d_2\ldots d_{p})_{\beta}\times \beta^{\color{var(--emphColor)} e}
\end{align*}
The bounds $m$ and $M$ on the integer
exponent $e$ determine limits of the system,
since $m \leq {\color{var(--emphColor)} e} \leq M$.
Properties of $\mathbb{F}(\beta, p, m, {\color{var(--emphColor)} M})$
In contrast to the reals, every FPS is finite and therefore bounded.
Every FPS has a largest element.
In particular,
\begin{align*}
\bigg|\pm\bigg(\sum_{n=1}^{p} d_n \beta^{-n}\bigg)\times \beta^e\bigg| \leq 0.(\beta-1)\cdots(\beta-1)_{\beta}\times\beta^{\color{var(--emphColor)} M}.
\end{align*}
Properties of $\mathbb{F}(\beta, p, {\color{var(--emphColor)} m}, M)$
Perhaps more surprisingly, each FPS has a smallest nonzero element (in magnitude).
In particular,
\begin{align*}
0.1_{\beta} \times \beta^{{\color{var(--emphColor)} m}} \leq \bigg|\pm \bigg(\sum_{n=1}^{p} d_n \beta^{-n}\bigg)\times \beta^e\bigg|
\end{align*}