 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
Example,
generalization, and interpretations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Interpretation
of payoffs:
|
|
|
2 = Temptation
|
|
|
1 = Reward
|
|
|
0 = Punishment
|
|
|
-1 = Sucker
|
|
|
Condition:
T > R > P > S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
b
- c = 1 = net benefits from
|
|
cooperation
|
|
c
= 1 = cost of cooperation
|
|
b
= 2 = benefit from other
|
|
|
(sucker’s)
cooperation
|
|
0
= benefits from no action
|
|
|
Condition:
b > c > 0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
The
dominant strategy is for both players to
|
defect, so
individually rational behavior
|
|
produces
a socially suboptimal outcome.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|