"Booze Not Bombs" and "March Madness" Background

The two longest threads of critical dialogue involved the sensitive and current political issue of the war on Iraq. The threads concerned a "Booze Not Bombs" party title and an "Ides of March Madness" dorm bet on the bombing of Iraq. The "Booze Not Bombs" e-mails were posted from March 4, 2003 to March 6, 2003, while the "Ides of March Madness" e-mails were posted from March 17, 2003 to March 28, 2003. The first critical conversation began with the following party email:

"My Fellow Juniperans... In keeping with the times, I propose a new name for our much-anticipated PARTY this Friday...BOOZE NOT BOMBS. Because how will we go to war if everyone is totally trashed?
-- Sam "Looking out for the interests of our nation" --
P.S. Just remember, everyone may not be for the war, but EVERYONE is for booze
"(Sam [pseudonym], juniperoldskool-chat post, 4 March 2003).

While some people in the dorm wanted this slogan for the party title, others felt strongly that the theme conveyed an controversial "peace not war" message: The bottom line is that a 'peace not war' message is still a political message, no matter how much of the dorm agrees with it or not. It is a message that I feel is inappropriate to be celebrating about (Adrian, juniperoldskool-chat post, 5 March 2003). One resident even finished an e-mail post by signing his middle name as an extremely controversial Ryan 'Let's Bomb Saddam' C (Ryan [pseudonym], juniperoldskool-chat post, 5 March 2003).

The Ides of March Madness

Junipero residents participating in the "March Madness" discussion also expressed strong sentiments about the war. Residents discussed everything from the merits of George Bush as Hitler to anti-American accusations:

"Over the past year and a half, I've felt ostracized because I haven't hesitated to criticize decisions our government has made. I stand by my choice, but it pains me to hear people say that I'm unpatriotic because I speak against governmental actions I disagree with. I just wish...that everyone could see that many people who are anti-war or anti-administration are not anti-America. For instance, I support our troops although I do not support this war. Let's put pettiness aside. We're all in this together" (Sheela [pseudonym], juniperoldskool-chat post, 18 March 2003).

This resident finished her e-mail by signing her middle name as "Sheela 'I'd love to discuss this with anyone' H," indicating the general dorm expectation that this online communication could generate a face-to-face discussion (Samagh, 2003).


Content and Page Design © 2003 Albert Andersen and Sonia Samagh.
Page last updated 6/3/2003