SYMBOLIC SYSTEMS 150:
Computers and Social Decisions (3 units)
Spring Quarter 2003-2004, Stanford University
Instructor: Todd
Davies
Meeting Time: Wednesdays 6:30-9:00 PM
Location: 460-127B
Instructor's Office: 460-040C (Margaret Jacks Hall, lower level)
Phone: x3-4091; Fax: x3-5666
Email: t-d-a-v-i-e-s-@-c-s-l-i-.-s-t-a-n-f-o-r-d-.-e-d-u
Course website: http://www.stanford.edu/class/symbsys150
Office Hours: Tuesdays, Wednesdays, and Thursdays 10:30
AM - 12:00 Noon
This is an evolving syllabus.
Check
back for updates each week. [Updated 5/5/2004]
OVERVIEW
This course represents an interdisciplinary approach to questions like
the following: How can computers and computer networks be used to
democratize
decision making in both society and smaller groupings of people?
What are the motivations for trying to do so? What are the
barriers?
What have people tried to do in this area, and what has happened
as a result? The idea is to review theories and empirical
findings, and
attempt
to apply these to the real-world challenges of democracy. This is
a service learning course, so in
addition
to readings, informal lectures, and written work,
each student will be expected to be involved in a project to
benefit an outside community client A goal of the project
component is to make at least some of the issues in the design of
social
decision systems more apparent, and to help students to see how
research
questions
can both inform and be informed by practical interventions.
Based on the first class discussion (3/31), I propose the following
tentative schedule and format for the course.
CURRENT SCHEDULE
Week 1 (3/31) - Paticipatory
Course Design
Introduction to the overall course goals. Group discussion and
input into the design of the course syllabus.
Weeks 2 & 3(4/7,14) - Political
Consciousness and Media
The contemporary political context, u.s. exceptionalism, longstanding
political attitudes, the current political polarization, and the
standard progressive critique of mass media.
Notes: Background on Political Consciousness
and Media (4/7)
Notes: Background on Political Consciousness
and Media, continued (4/14)
REQUIRED READING:
- Alberto
Alesina, Edward Glaeser, and Bruce Sacerdote (2001), "Why Doesn't the
United States Have a European-Style Welfare State?", Brookings Papers
on Economic Activity, 2:187-277
- Zogby
International (2004), "O'Leary, Zogby, SMU's Tower Center Zogby
American Values Survey I - 2004", O'Leary
Report, 1(1), January and "Poll
Results"
- Robert
McChesney (1999), Rich Media, Poor
Democracy, The New Press (excerpts)
SUPPLEMENTARY LINKS:
Weeks 3 & 4 (4/14,21) -
Digital
Divides
Inequity in access, control, and use of the Internet,
recent data and trends, cultural differences, and practical
interventions.
Guest speaker: Rolando
Zeledon, Plugged In and the East Palo Alto Community Network (4/21)
Group Project Description
- John
P. Robinson (2003), "Introduction to Issues 4 and 5 -- Digital Divides:
Past,
Present, and Future", IT &
Society, 1(5), Summer,
pp. i-xiv
- Choose at least one other article from: The
Digital Divide (2003), IT &
Society, 1(4), Spring or Digital
Divides: Past, Present, and Future (2003), IT & Society, 1(5), Summer
- Todd
Davies, Benjamin Sywulka, Randy Saffold, and Roma Jhavery (2002),
"Community Democracy Online: A Preliminary Report from East Palo Alto",
98th American Political Science Association Meeting, August
Weeks 4 & 5 (4/21,28) - Markets and Games
Game theory, market approaches to resource allocation, market failure,
and voluntary approaches (e.g. philanthropy and social
entrepreneurship).
Notes: Utility Theory and Game
Theory (4/28)
Notes: Market Failure and the
Internet (4/28)
- Shaun Hargreaves Heap, Martin Hollis, Bruce Lyons, Robert Sugden,
and
Albert Weale (1992), The Theory of Choice: A Critical Guide,
Oxford:Blackwell
Publishers, pp. 94-154
Weeks 5 & 6 (4/28,5/5) - Voting
and Social Choices
Social choice theory, political economy and electoral systems.
- Joe B. Stevens (1993), The Economics of Collective Choice,
Boulder:
Westview Press, pp. 133-167
Weeks 6 & 7 (5/5,12) - Organizations
and Communities
Flows of information and opinion in social
networks and online communities.
Guest speaker: Goro
Mitchell, Community Development
Institute (5/5)
- Robert
Huckfeldt, Paul Allen Beck, Russell J. Dalton, and Jeffrey Levine
(1995), "Political Environments, Cohesive Social Groups, and the
Communication of Public Opinion", American
Journal of Political Science, 39(4): 1025-1054 (requires
Stanford connection)
- John B. Horrigan and
Lee Rainie (2002), "Emails
That Matter: Changing Patterns of Internet Use Over a Year's Time", IT & Society, 1(1): 135-150
- Barry
Wellman, Jeffrey Boase, and Wenhong Chen
(2002), "The Networked Nature of Community Online and Offline", IT & Society,
1(1): 151-165
Weeks 7 & 8 (5/12,19) - Online
Deliberation I: Theory and Philosophy
Distributive and procedural ethics, Habermas and the public
sphere.
- Jürgen Habermas (1983), "Discourse Ethics: Notes on a
Program of Philosophical Justification", Moral Consciousness and Communicative
Action, originally appeared in German (translated by Christian
Lenhart and Shierry Weber Nicholsen), The MIT Press, 1990, pp. 43-115
Weeks 8 & 9 (5/19,26) - Online Deliberation II: Evidence and Design
Studies of deliberation, on- and offline, design of online deliberation
environments.
Weeks 9 & 10 (5/26,2) - Internet
Law and Policy
Internet protocols and their effects, censorship, privacy, and
copyright issues.
- Lawrence
Lessig (2000), "Code Is Law: On Liberty in Cyberspace", Harvard Magazine, January-February
- Lawrence
Lessig (2001), "Privacy and Attention Span", The Georgetown Law Journal, 89(6):
2063+
- Lawrence
Lessig (2003), "Open Source Baselines: Compared to What?", In Robert W.
Hahn (Ed.), Government Policy Toward
Open Source Software, pp. 50-68
Week 10 (6/2) - Group Project Presentations
FORMAT
Each session is 150 minutes, of which I propose to spend
approximately 45-60 minutes presenting and discussing what is in
the reading for that week, followed by 45-60 minutes presenting and
discussing material that is not in or is preparatory for the readings,
with 30-60 minutes left over for extra discussion, review of project
work, and/or a guest lecturer.
GRADING BASIS (see also below)
1. Posted online comments (50%)
2. Project (30%)
3. Participation and attendance (20%, assessed subjectively)
ONLINE COMMENTS
At the class's suggestion, 50% of the grade will be based on posted
comments to an online forum. Details regarding how to post will
be discussed at the second meeting.
PROJECTS
This is a service
learning course, and each student is expected to
participate in a project designed to serve some greater community
interest. Details regarding the project/s will be worked out
during the second and third class meetings. Grading for the
project will be based 40% on individual presentations and 60% on the
group write-up.