ME397 Design Theory & Methodology Seminar

From DesignX Wiki

Revision as of 00:00, 11 October 2012 by Bcurrano (Talk | contribs)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search

This is the homepage for the ME397 Design Theory and Methodology Seminar, the 2012-2013 Edition


ME397 will be offered Autumn, Winter and Spring Quarters and is congruent with Professor Leifer's research group, designX-lab.

Instructors: Rebecca Currano and Larry Leifer

Location: Center for Design Research at Stanford (bldg.560, 2nd floor).

Meeting Time: Wednesdays, 17:15-18:30 (5:15pm to 6:30pm) (397ers are free to leave as need be at 6:05)

Credit: 1 unit for attendance, 2-5 units for documented research



Research Work Opportunities

PhD's:

Have research work to be done?  Looking for help?  Advertise here:



Undergrad/Masters/ME397:

Looking for research work?  Have skills?  Advertise here:





LAST OFFERED Autumn Aquarter 2011

Instructors: Greg Kress & Martin Steinert, Ph.D. 

Location: Center for Design Research (Bldg. 560), first floor common area

Session: Wednesdays, 3:15-5:05PM

Credits: 1-3

Term: Autumn Quarter, 2011


Overview: This course will explore several factors that help designers and design teams from cognitive and educational perspectives. In particular we will explore the meaning and manifestations of factors like empathy, "social sensitivity" and "extraverted feeling," which have been shown in practice and prior research to impact design performance. Students will participate in reflective design activities to understand and model the cognitive processes behind design. Students will also participate in the design and pilot testing of new experimental methods.


Class Project: Each student is expected to participate in and complete the class project. This will include the design and pilot test of an experimental metric for observing cognitive preferences manifested in teams, or possibly other measures of team effectiveness. A successful project should include:

  • Prior work. What similar experiments have been conducted in the past? What can you learn from this prior work? What aspects of the methodology can you borrow? What is new or different about your application? What other similar concepts are out there?
  • Pilot test. What is the fastest and simplest way to test your experimental setup? How will you know if it is working? Test your setup with classmates or others (not on yourself!). What did you learn? What would you change or improve?
  • Experiment design. How would you conduct this experiment if it were to be carried out in full? What sample size would you need? What variables would you concentrate on, and how would you isolate them? What are your hypotheses?
  • Question-driven process. Please note and record questions that come up during your investigations. Their nature can be practical in terms of the experiments or data gathering, or more focused onto future research (e.g. identifying knowledge gaps).
  • Idea log. Keep a list of everything you come up with. This will help you to be reflective in your thinking and give you a useful record of your design process. Ideas that do not seem immediately relevant or possible to accomplish can still have tremendous value.


Milestones:

  • Nov. 2: A collection of possible approaches in your idealog (at least five); rough sketch of experiment design. Have at least one outside reference.    
  • Nov. 9: Be ready to run a pilot test in class. Continue to collect references, revise and refine your experiment design, and update your idealog.
  • Nov. 16: Second round of pilot tests. All students who did not conduct a pilot test on Nov. 9 should be prepared to do so. Students that did conduct a pilot test on Nov. 9 should have their results compiled and analyzed to share with the class, as well as a written list of improvements for (or new draft of) the next iteration. 
  • Nov. 23: Thanksgiving Holiday (No class)
  • Nov. 30: Pilot test results/analysis presented to the group (be visual and clear in your presentation in a way that will encourage constructive feedback). Polished experimental design for how you would proceed, given pilot test findings.
  • Dec. 7: All materials submitted. Class field trip.


Readings: Students are required to explore, collect and contribute their own references to the seminar as the projects develop. We will begin with the following texts:

  • Woolley, A.W. et al. "Evidence for a Collective Intelligence Factor in the Performance of Human Groups." Science 29 October 2010: Vol. 330 no. 6004 pp. 686-688.
  • Kress, G. & Schar, M. "Initial Conditions: The Structure and Composition of Effective Design Teams." Proceedings of the International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED) 2011, Copenhagen. 
  • Selections from Teamology
  • Selections from Psychological Types (C.G. Jung)


Credit Breakdown: Participation in in-class discussions, activities and reading assignments is required for 1 credit. Students wishing to take the course for 2 or 3 credits should expect additional requirements to be discussed with the instructors.


Enrollment: Enrollment to this class will be limited. It is recommended that interested students attend the first class session on Sept. 28th.

Personal tools