EMF OP 46 Insights from Integrated Assessment
Occasional PaperAuthor
John P. Weyant - Stanford University
Published by
Stanford University, 1996
Integrated assessment is defined
here as any attempt to integrate information from and across
disciplines to help in the process of developing policy responses
(Parson, 1994). Assessment is distinguished from disciplinary research
by its purpose: to inform policy and decision, rather than to advance
knowledge for its intrinsic value. Integrated assessment is identified
by the breadth of knowledge sources on which it draws; it is to be
distinguishes from those (infrequent) instances in which a significant
policy issues can be well informed by a clear presentation of a body of
knowledge held within a single discipline. Distinguishing integrated
assessment from other assessment is important because integrated
assessment poses distinct and difficult challenges.
The broader the set of knowledge domains that must be synthesized to
inform a policy or decision, the greater the intellectual and
managerial problems that must be overcome to do the assessment well and
make it useful to its audience. How integrated any particular
assessment must be depends on the issue or the decision to be informed.
Perhaps more than any other policy issue, global climate change
requires integrated assessment. Making rational, informed social
decisions on climate change potentially requires knowledge of the human
activities that affect greenhouse gas emissions; the atmospheric,
oceanic, and biological processes that link emissions to atmospheric
concentrations; the climatic and radiative processes that link
atmospheric concentrations to global and regional climate; the
ecological, economic, and socio-political processes by which such
evaluations are made. Any progress in understanding, and responding to,
an issue of such complexity will require the capacity to integrate,
reconcile, organize, and communicate knowledge across domains – that
is, to do integrated assessment. This need has been widely recognized,
in calls to advance methods of integrated assessment, and in the large
number of projects now underway. While there have been past examples of
integrated assessments of major environmental issues (e.g. the American
CIAP Project, Grobecker et al 1974, and the European acid rain studies
integrated in the RAINS model, Alcamo et al 1990), the current level of
integrated assessment activity on global climate change is
unprecedented.



