Recent stories
Arts/
Entertainment
Books

Columnists-Arts/
Entertainment

Columnists-
Texas Living
Fashion
Food
GuideLive
High Profile
House & Garden
Texas Living
Travel
Home page
Search
  
Arts/Entertainment
Business
Columnists
Extra
Food
GuideLive
Health | Science
House & Garden
Lottery
Metro | Obituaries
National | World
Opinion
Politics
Religion
Sports Day
Technology
Texas Living
Texas & Southwest
Texas Legislature
Traffic
Travel
Weather
Registration
Classifieds
Employment
Automotive
Real Estate
Contact us
Site index
Online extras
Card stock: Create an e-card
Making the cut as a Rangerette
Get a letter from Santa
Graduated style: Add to a first apartment
Making balloon animals
A guide to foundations and repairs
Winning wines
Wired for school: Students report on school life
GPX Skate Park & Entertainment Center
The senses that give our lives richness and texture

Forums
Recipe exchange
Movies

[an error occurred while processing this directive]





Science and security: Chasing nuclear 'secrets'

11/17/2001

By TOM SIEGFRIED / The Dallas Morning News

TEMPE, Ariz. - In searching science books for help with homeland security, you wouldn't be likely to linger over the chapter on neutrinos.

Elementary particle physics seems as far from the war on terrorism as Afghanistan is from Albuquerque. What neutrinos are and what they do rarely makes the Top 10 list of things every public policy-maker should know.

Yet these subatomic particles may offer diplomats a new device for strengthening treaties to counter one of terrorism's most fearsome threats - nuclear explosives.

Building a nuclear bomb isn't all that easy, but the blueprints aren't exactly secret anymore. Experts agree that technically trained terrorists could construct a crude nuclear explosive device. The main obstacle to creating such a nuclear nightmare would be acquiring the raw materials - substances capable of rapid nuclear fission.

Fission, or "splitting the atom," was discovered in 1938, originally in uranium. Ordinary uranium poses no explosive danger, though; for a bomb you need a highly-enriched recipe containing mostly a form found only in traces in uranium ore. Or you could use plutonium, an element rare in nature but copiously produced in nuclear reactors.

Worldwide, about 1,000 reactors operate nowadays, more than 400 to produce electric power, with most of the others used for research. It's possible to extract the plutonium produced in either reactor type and use it to build a nuclear explosive.

International treaties have attempted to prohibit any such plutonium diversion. Those treaties call for safeguards including video monitoring and occasional inspections. But nobody really thinks the system is foolproof.

"I think it's well-known in that community that you can't trust the monitoring very well," says Giorgio Gratta, a physicist at Stanford University.

But you can trust neutrinos.

Seven decades ago, the Austrian physicist Wolfgang Pauli suspected that some radioactive substances emitted an invisible particle along with other particles easier to detect. By the 1950s, other physicists figured out how to record the presence of Pauli's particle, by then known as the neutrino.

Neutrinos are famous for their ghostly properties - able to zip through a wall of lead a light-year thick, so light as to be nearly massless, so fast as to be nearly as fast as light itself. But scientific neutrinobusters can apprehend the elusive particles anyway - if they are present in sufficient abundance.

And nuclear reactors are the most prolific neutrino factories on the planet. When a uranium or plutonium atom splits, the fragments are just the sort of radioactive substances that emit neutrinos like crazy. (Actually, we're talking about antineutrinos here, but let's keep it simple.)

What's more, the neutrinos zip out of the reactor core carrying different amounts of energy, depending on what atoms made them. Measuring the energy of neutrinos flying from a reactor, therefore, can tell scientists what substances the reactor is hiding inside, Dr. Gratta explained last week at a seminar sponsored by the Council for the Advancement of Science Writing.

Dr. Gratta and Yifang Wang of Stanford have collaborated with Adam Bernstein and Todd West of Sandia National Laboratories in Livermore, Calif., to calculate just how effective neutrino monitoring of a reactor could be. (Don't tell O.B.L., but you can read their paper at xxx.lanl.gov/abs/nucl-ex/0108001.)

In most cases, it would be possible to detect the extraction of plutonium from a reactor or even to tell whether the reactor fuel had been altered to produce plutonium more rapidly.

Unlike ordinary inspections, which might take place only twice a year, when the reactor was turned off, neutrino monitoring could go on constantly.

"You could have it on the Internet," says Dr. Gratta. "You're looking in real time at what's happening inside the core of the reactor."

All it takes is connecting computers to a cube about 3 feet on each side filled with the proper organic solvents, along with detectors to record the flashes of light created by neutrinos striking hydrogen atoms in the solvent. (These collisions also produce neutrons, so you have to measure them, too.) Computers can analyze the collisions to determine the neutrinos' energy.

This plan is about to be tested at the San Onofre reactor in California, where the detecting cube will be positioned in a service area about 80 feet from the core. The cube should record nearly 3,000 neutrino hits a day.

Of course, to know whether anybody is messing with the reactor, you have to know what the energy of those neutrinos is supposed to be in the first place. So this system works only because scientists have been playing around with neutrinos for decades - not for homeland security, but for understanding the particles that nature is made of, how the sun shines, and how the universe works. It's the kind of physics that politicians often criticize as not sufficiently relevant to daily life to be worth a lot of funding. Knowledge and security, though, are both precious to society, and it's unwise to demand one without the other.











Subscribe to The Dallas Morning News Classifieds.DallasNews.com Community.DallasNews.com DallasNews.com Archives


Subscribe to The Dallas Morning News and get your first two weeks free. Click here for details.

© 2001 The Dallas Morning News
Privacy policy