Sit-to-Stand as an Evaluation Tool for Balance

B.S. Troy, D.E. Kenney, and E.E. Sabelman

Department of Veterans Affairs Health Care System
Rehabilitation R&D Center
Palo Alto, CA  94304

Difficulty with sit-to-stand (STS) is one of several neuromuscular performance risk factors associated with multiple falls. People with Parkinson's disease (PD) have been shown to exhibit a prolonged duration of STS when compared with normal healthy elders (NE). The purpose of this study was to determine whether a quantitative measure of sit-to-stand correlates with increased falls risk. Twenty NE and 17 PD subjects were asked to perform 14 balance tasks varying in difficulty from sitting balance to one-legged stance. Tasks were scored using a 2-3 point scale for a maximum qualitative balance score (QBS) of 23 points. Subjects also completed a self-report falls history from which a fall injury index (FI) was derived. STS was performed at normal speed, arms crossed (arms ok if otherwise unable), and recorded using a wearable accelerometric motion analysis system. The averaged right and left waist vector magnitudes were utilized to identify the time of momentum transfer (tmin-tmax) and to identify normal and abnormal patterns of accelerometric patterns. In normal the maximum directly preceeds the minimum (peak ID (PI)=0). This marks the start (max) and end (min) of momentum transfer during STS. An abnormal pattern the max peak follows the min (PI=2) or preceeds the min by more than 2 peaks (PI=1) A high FI (fallers) correlated moderately with both a low QBS (Pearon's r=.68) and a high PI (r=.77) score. While subjects with PD (.98 + 1.10 sec) did take longer to perform the momentum transfer stage of STS than NE (.58 + .12 sec) the difference was not significant. Accelerometric analysis of STS shows potential for falls prediction in different elder populations.


Next Last Index