The task of deciding how much inequality should be allowed rests in part on judgments about what constitutes the good society. Although philosophers have historically weighed in on questions of this sort, ordinary people also develop preferences for certain amounts of inequality and fashion narratives that justify these preferences.
Does justice call for raising the minimum income level as high as possible? Is it just as important to reduce the most spectacular forms of wealth at the top of the income distribution as it is to reduce the most spectacular forms of poverty at the bottom? Should we be concerned about the losses in liberty occasioned whenever "forcible" redistribution is attempted (e.g., minimum wage laws, estate tax laws)?
Do people regard the current level of inequality as excessive? How much inequality would most people like? Under what conditions, if any, do people regard extreme inequality as justifiable? Is inequality regarded as more palatable when it is "fairly" won in an open competition?
Click on the buttons for examples of recent policy analysis, basic research, and journalism addressing this Key Issue
May require Adobe Reader.
Explore All Media and Affiliates
Click on the active buttons for a full listing of all the important policy analysis, basic research, or journalism addressing this key issue. Also explore our working papers addressing this key issue and our affiliates with expertise in this key issue.