Science Art-Nature .presents:
Science Art-Nature Home


Darryl Wheye's Commentary

                  Imagine life on Earth, if vision had not evolved. How different might
               plants and animals look?


Darwin's mechanism of natural selection shows us how to understand some of the roles of color and shape and size. So, if vision had not evolved....

there would be no need for cryptic coloration,    
no possibility of heeding warning coloration,   
 
                     
and no advantage in possessing vibrant coloration   
                     
or predator-deterring eyespots

...so would most mimicry be auditory...or tactile...or olfactory?
                      
   Would more flowers be white?



Would males and females be visibly
more similar ...or less?

   

Leave a comment on vision and natural selection?



                  Imagine trying to visualize shared ancestry in Darwin's day (1800s):
     

Darwin explored the idea of shared ancestry without the aid of high power magnification, or chromatography, or mass spectrography, or carbon dating, or xrays...



In the “The Common Hand” (National Geographic, May, 2012), Carl Zimmer wrote that our hands began to evolve from fins at least 380 million years ago, and within 40 million years, held five fingers. Many animals have hands. Did hands emerge independently over, and over again, or did they evolve from a common ancestor? As Zimmer noted, “Darwin could recognize only the outward signs that hands had evolved from a common ancestor. Today scientists are uncovering the inward signs as well.”

These 3D illustrations of radiographic images by Bryan Christie, Joe Lertola, Jeong Suh, and Victoria Rompilla [check sequence with Erica] featured in the Zimmer article, show how much more difficult it was for Darwin to recognize the hand of the elephant, or aye-aye, or bat or than it is for us. The hand of the elephant is obscured by adaptations to withstand extreme weight. The hand of the aye-aye, a long fingered lemur, is capable of teasing out insect larvae hidden in recesses of trees. The thin- fingered hand of the bat (modeled here, on a flying fox) is adapted to stretch the mem- branous wing into flight-worthiness.

For more please see:
this link


Leave a comment on shared ancestry and the process of evolution?




                  Imagine evolution as seen through the eyes of children:

Darwin gave us tools to look back in time. Looking forward might matter even more today.


   


In this exhibit, windows on the process of evolution convey the importance of using this lens to better understand how our role as stewards must take into consideration the long, sensitively-tuned relationships among species and their enviroment. It is increasingly clear the degree to which we influence those relationships through policies we endorse and personal decisions we make.

In light of this, it may help to consider how your view of human evolution compares with that of other stewards. In the U.S., for example, a 2012 Gallup Poll found that 15 percent held the view that humans evolved without divine intervention, 32 percent held the view that humans evolved with God's guidance, and 46 percent held the view that God created humans in our present form at one time within the last 10,000 years.

It may also help to consider how your view of evolution might compare with that of tomorrow's stewards, as seen here in a painting by the German artist Bernd Pöppelmann, Die Sünden ihrer Väter (Sins of Her Fathers) (35 x 47”, oil on linen). Eventually, these children will be considering our sins and how fast they will need to scramble to try to overcome them so that their children will find fewer tire tracks in barren soil and a chance for a better balance between human life and that of other species.

>


Leave a comment on the evolutionary process and sustainability issues?


 
         

© 2013 Science Art-Nature
contact