And the Life of Poetry
By David Mason
Story Line; 203 pages; $15.95 paperback
Many have decried the lack of serious poetry criticism, recalling the
glory days of the mid-century when Randall Jarrell, Edmund Wilson,
Delmore Schwartz, R.P. Blackmur, Louise Bogan, Weldon Kees and others
plied the popular press with a regular routine of praise and blame.
A few have stepped bravely into the void, but poetry and its
criticism have nevertheless remained very much a niche market. One of
the most recent attempts to assay a broader public is David Mason's
``The Poetry of Life: And the Life of Poetry.''
Mason, author of two award-winning volumes of poetry,
identifies his West Coast allegiances from the outset and distances
himself from the ivory tower: He grew up in the Puget Sound and
worked at a wide range of (often manual) jobs before he became a
professor. In the course of the 20 essays included in this book, he
mentions that he drove a pea combine in Washington's Skagit
Valley and unloaded crab boats for six months in Dutch Harbor,
Alaska, credentials he offers as proudly as his academic status at
Colorado College in Colorado Springs.
His point: The West is populist, unbound by the critical
prejudices
of the East Coast literary establishment and academia, so it can
offer a refreshing, shrewd alternative take on current literary fads
and fashions. As Mason notes, ``The best poets eventually come to
believe in an audience of intelligent listeners, not just in decoding
critics.''
Mason energetically points out when the emperor is in the
altogether, one of the many strengths of his provocative, insightful book.
Certainly, it's cheering to see an academic echo what so many of us
have felt when reading critically praised but irritatingly opaque
works:
``When critics like Edna Longley praise (Irish poet Medbh
McGuckian) for her `teasing subversions, her dismantling of hierarchy
and authority,' my answer is stubbornly simple: why can't she make it
all more fun to read? If `she writes a symbolic meta-language with
its own emblematic grammar,' well, pardon me for choosing to read
someone else.''
It's a point worth making. A huge potential audience has been
disenfranchised from poetry since mid-
century. This alienated ``we'' is the audience Mason is trying to
reach: ``I have in mind that audience of grown-ups arguing about
books even while they discuss their divorces, the latest political
tremors or a new movie coming to town.''
Will he get such an audience? Not terribly likely. Story Line
Press in Ashland, Ore., has an impressive record (publishing Donald
Justice, Maxine Kumin and Rita Dove, among others), but it's not
mainstream. Moreover, Mason tends to refer repeatedly, perhaps
excessively, to a few key figures within the New Formalist movement,
a label that means little outside poetry
cliques, and whose cause needs more spelling out for the general
reader than it gets in this volume. The result: His book may be
pitched to a narrower audience than necessary.
It's too bad if it is. With the much-ballyhooed ``poetry
renaissance,'' with haiku in grocery stores, poems on the backs of
buses and all the silliness of National Poetry Month, the public
could use a practical, fresh approach to the modern poetry scene, one
that neither condescends with self-indulgent, feel-good pap nor
mystifies with inbred, pretentious jargon.
``Why is most contemporary poetry so dull?'' Mason asks. He points
out that his uneducated Scots father-in-law could recite hundreds and
hundreds of lines of Robert Burns -- without the support of a
national advertising campaign.
Mason defines poetry as ``memorable speech.'' He frequently
points out instances where poets wrote better poems with metrical
forms: Anne Sexton, he says, desperately needed (and initially had)
the discipline of form to protect her from her worst
self-indulgences. Anyone who's tried to memorize poetry can confirm
his common-sense point: ``I can't help noticing how good free verse
often settles into metered lines at key points,'' he writes, and
often at the best points, too.
He also dusts off iconic but neglected figures: Longfellow,
whose metrical ingeniousness he praises; or Whittier, sometimes
``full of charm, a quality we should not underrate''; or Tennyson, in
whom he now takes ``an unguilty pleasure.'' One welcomes his scansion
of Tennyson's ``Break, Break, Break,'' a useful step in guiding the
uninitiated through some of the arcana of less obvious meters and
stanzas.
One also applauds his attempts to fold less recognized poets
into the modern canon -- such mavericks as J.V. Cunningham, or
``political'' poet Thomas McGrath, ``the most famous neglected poet
of recent decades'' -- as well as his dunkings. Heedless of received
wisdom, he writes, ``Ginsberg's `Howl' now seems to me a crashing
bore, whatever its historical interest.''
``The Poetry of Life'' is crusty, generous, lyrical and
iconoclastic, a bold, alternative menu to ubiquitous pablum of poetry
``appreciations.'' Mason has his faults: He's sometimes brusque and
superficial in passing judgment, digressive, occasionally weak or
glancing in a description or phrase. But many of his arguments are
convincing, in some cases inarguable, and one may find oneself
unconsciously adopting them even as one pencils rebuttals in the
margins.
``Truth matters even when we doubt our ability to know it,'' says
Mason, who is bound to arouse controversy over just those truths he
doubts least.
Palo Alto critic Cynthia L. Haven has written for the Washington Post and San Francisco Magazine.