Home
  Introduction
  Justice
  Merit
Fairness
  Benefits
  Conclusion
  Credits
  Download
Misconception #3: Fairness is best achieved through race-neutral policy.

The chapter by Shana Levin, "Social Psychological Evidence on Race and Racism," leads to one of the central tenets of this volume, that racism (whether intentional or not) exists and has always existed in this country on an individual, institutional, and societal level. Therefore, proxies for race will be unable to address current disparities that were historically created by race and racial practices. The two sides of the "fairness" debate can be characterized in terms of the "individual perspective" and the "group perspective." The individual perspective proposes that all individuals, regardless of race, should be judged on the same established criteria of competence, which are considered objective. According to the group perspective, however, using the same standards to judge individuals from majority and minority groups is unfair because differences in power prevent the two groups from having equal opportunity.

The evidence presented in this chapter supports Justice Blackmun’s opinion in the 1979 Bakke case: "In order to get beyond racism, we must first take account of race. There is no other way…In order to treat persons equally, we must treat them differently" (Regents of the University of California vs. Bakke 1978, p. 2806-2808).

The following issues and evidence are discussed: