"A lot of people say that Jack only had about twelve ideas, but that they were the most important 12 ideas of the last 25 years. He created a theatrical universe that no one had ever seen before, with himself at the center."
 -Ron Vawter

Jack Smith’s 12 Great Ideas:
1. Time:  Time may be cultivated to flow at different rates through each stratum of reality contained in a piece of theatre. For example, time seems to quicken when Vawter plays with props and engages the other performer in set and lighting changes. These activities are void of fiction. They exist in the most daily strata of reality. Each layer of character, in contrast, is contained within a unique fictive reality that maintains a slower temporal quality. The reality of the film images being presented on the wall requires yet another temporal engagement.
2. Plot:  Plot-as-structure is replaced by a sensibility more akin to the work of visual artist or a music composer.  The theatre is a visceral canvas – a visual symphony / cacophony.
3. Collage: Theatre takes hold of the current media-induced anarchy.  No object – the boombox, image – the slide show, or sound – Arabian Nights, does not belong.  Collage creates a sensory disorientation that jars spectators out of their habitual way of perceiving and conceiving.  Serendipitous collisions of elements are use by theatre artists and their spectators to develop unique and personal interpretations of the performance.
6. Pastiche: Elements of the performance imitate and homage some previous work. The most blatant example of this is Vawter’s imitation of Smith. It is not satire but a way of discussing / creating contemporary culture in art with historical reference.
5. Object as character; character as thing:  With no subtext to flesh out in text or action, all character elements are given a certain freedom and unpredictability.  An actress can not state, “My character wouldn’t do that.”  Without a need to integrate back-story, there becomes little distinction between actors and objects as characters. Objects, such as Vawter’s onion, take on a character role because they no longer require careful introduction in order to be meaningful.
6. Scored Improvisation: One can never quite tell what is scored and what is improvised. In addition, the score becomes mostly a choreography of mundane gestures more than a dramatic script for character. Smith’s physical scores flawlessly improvised with ever-changing media.  Spontaneity was a perfect illusion built in to his scores while he edited and reedited media clips throughout the performance.
7. Repetitive Gesture: Meaning emerges from a repetitive gesture through a process of disorientation and habituation.  Vawter picks at his costume and adjusts his scarf. At first, the gesture is thought to represent a character trait. For example, one might extrapolate from the picking gesture that Vawter’s character is obsessed with cleanliness. But through repetition, the gesture looses this application and becomes a more abstract element. It is as if the spectator’s thinking has moved from literal and representative to symbolic; relating the gesture to a unified conception of the piece.
8. Simultaneous Action, Non-action and Deintellectualization: Theatre uses the polar extremes of stimulation to free the spectator from their intellect.  Silence, long pauses, and even boredom are used to frustrate the audience’s need to understand the action in a traditional way.  Likewise, total sensory overload - sound, image, gestural repetition, symbols and cultivated anarchy shocks the audience out of a cerebral experience and into a corporeal experience.
9. Alienation of Group; Empowerment of Individual: Stratified realities replace linear narrative. Layers of character replace a clear antagonist / protagonist structure. Collage is used to juxtapose historical and contemporary symbols. Repetitive gesture is closed to simple interpretation. Combined, these elements provide great fodder for the individual intellect but greatly complicate a shared intellectual experience.  In this way, the group nature of spectatorship is replaced by individual relativism. Post-show banter will be as varied as the stimulation provided in the piece.
10. Text:  Text conveys some meaning in a given context and as sound in space produced by a performer.  The meaning of the text itself, in a literary sense, may be lost.  Thus, source text may be nonsensical or it may be rendered nonsensical but will carry meaning in the over-all perception of the piece.
11. Fictive Reality: What is really going on here?  Theatre shows its "underwire" because: 1. Underwire is beautiful and meaningful. 2. Everyone knows the underwire is there.  3.  The stakes of engagement are raised for both the artist and spectator when we collectively engage in "what is really going on."
12. Cult of Personality:  The performer may act out a character. That is to say, a performer may pretend that he is someone who he is not. That layer of pretend is a viable reality, albeit fictive, that is unique and separate from other strata of reality contained within the theatre piece.  Consider Jack Smith pretending that he is Maria Montez or Ron Vawter pretending that he is Jack Smith. Two or three personalities are at play here. One does not supersede another. The performer can never be masked by a character and, likewise, a character can not exist in the absence of the performer’s personality.
 

Waters, Allison


01/06/2005