Energy Modeling Forum at Stanford University
Energy Modeling Forum

 
Subscribe | Post Question | Address & Map
CCIIA 2010 PRESENTATIONS


  EMF Workshop on Climate Change Impacts and Integrated Assessment

July 27-August 4, 2010

Snowmass, Colorado

July 27 | July 28 | July 29| July 30 | August 2 | August 3 | August 4

Presentations

 

July 27, 2010

Introduction & Overview

R. Moss, Scenario Development and IAV/IAM Interactions: Summary of National Academy of Sciences Meeting

T. Wilbanks, Via Needs for RSPs: Scenario Development and IAV IAM Interactions

C. Fields, M. Mastrandrea, K. Mach, On the Need for RSPs: a Working Group II Perspective

K. Strzepek, Socioeconomic Development Paths and their Implications for Water Resources, Agricultural , and Environmental Systems

B. O'Neill, Needs for RSPs/CSAs

D. van Vuuren, Quantitative comparisons of RCPs

E. Kriegler, Socio-economic Scenario Develop ment for Climate Change Analysis

K. Takahashi, Collaboration among IAV, IAM, and CM for IAV Studies in the IntegrationPhase of New Scenario Development Process

V. Krey, K. Riahi, P. Kolp, IAMC Community Scenario Database (Beta-version)

R. Vallario, Perspectives on IAV/IAM Interactions in Context of DOE’s Integrated Assessment Research Program (IARP)

C. Field, What Aspects of Context?
S. Rose, Exploring Consistency with Climate Outcomes: a simple data mining exercise
R. Kopp, DOE PI/CCTP Impact Activities and Needs

(Top)

July 28, 2010

K. Strzepek, Multimetric Valuation Water Resources

M. Rosegrant, Sectoral Approaches to Multi-metric Valuation: Agriculture
T. Janetos, Ecosystem Services 
K. Ebi, Health Approaches to Valuation

J. Smith, Estimates of the Cost of Adaptation

J. Gulledge, Assessing the Value of Climate Policy: The Decision Maker's Dilemma
G. Yohe, Framing the Co-Benefits Discussion
J. Balbus, Co-benefits and Climate Change: The Public Health Perspective
 
M. Hanemann, Non-Market Valuation
S. Rose, The Importance of Multi-metric, Scale, and Sector Climate Change Impacts Valuation
T. Wilbanks, Infrastructure and Energy

July 29, 2010

R. Tol, Decisionmaking with Fat Tails

G. Yohe, Fundamentals of the Value of Information
E. Kriegler, Perspective on the Use(fulness) of IAMs in the Policy Process
J. Edmonds, Modelers Perspective on the Use of IAMs

T. van Ierland, The Role of IAMs, a User's Perspective

G. Morgan, Some Thoughts on Uncertainty, Scenarios, and Thinking about the Future
  • Morgan7-29 (214.6KB +PDF+) - Experts Assessments of Future Photovoltaic Technologies
R. Bierbaum, Integrated Assessment Modeling for Informing Policy and Decisionmaking: Where do we go from Here?
R. Richels, Challenges in Climate Change Integrated Assessments - Part 3
 
R. Moss, Scenarios and Uncertainties: Roles of IAMs (and other methods)
J. Fellows, Factors to Consider in Priority-Setting
G. Meehl, What's going on with CMIP5 (at least at NCAR) and will model uncertainty grow in the AR5? O. Edenhofer and B. Knopf, Low Mitigation Scenarios in Second-Best Worlds

July 30, 2010

 
E. Maibach, Five Thoughts about Communicating Climate Change Impacts and Integrated Assessment Findings 
 
J. Weyant, Communicating with Policy Makers - informing not confusing? Two examples from the Energy Modeling Forum
T. Janetos, Wrap-Up: Key Action Oriented Messages and Possible Destinations
T. Wilson , Communication with Decisionmakers
T. Fiddaman, Use of Models for Communication: the C-ROADS Experience
S. Hassol, Overcoming Communication Blind Spots
O. Edenhofer, Integrated Assessment Models for the Policy Science Interface

(Top)

August 2, 2010

B. Flannery, Post Copenhagen: Integrated Assessment Policy Analysis in a Mosaic World

T. van Ierland, EU Climate Action
T. Masui, Recent Climate Policy in Japan
K. Jiang, Policy Direction on Climate Change in China and Modelling Tools to answer questions
P. Shukla, India's Copenhagen Commitments
G. Metcalf, Linking Policies in a Mosaic World: Options and Issues

T. Sugiyama, Modeling Mosaic World: A Japanese Perspective

R. Tol, IAMs for Policy Support?
D. Montgomery, L. Lane, Investment and Technology Deployment: An Institutional Perspective on Climate Analysis
A. Morris, Post-Copenhagen US Climate Change Policy
(Top)

August 3, 2010

D. Arent, Modeling Renewable Energy Technologies in IAMs for Mitigating Future Climate Change (Introduction)

E. Kriegler, Observations on the New Wind Resouce Potential Estimates

T. Masui, Scenario Assessment Interim Results From AIM

E. Kriegler, Analysis of Potential for Wind ElectricityProduction Using the REMIND Model

E. Kriegler, Accounting for Power Sector Variability in the REMIND Model
H. Jorgensen, Regional Wind Resource Distributions: mesoscale results and importance of microscale modeling
S. Rose, Biomass Availability for Generation
D. van Vuuren, Global Wind Potential
J. Nelson, An Introduction to the SWITCH Model of the Western North American Electricity Grid
S. Rose, Wind Resource Comparison
C. Hoyer-Click, Scaling in Solar Resource Assessments
D. Renné, An Example of Solar Resource Spatial Variability Analysis
W. Short, Modeling Wind and Solar - Correlations and Storage
 
D. Heimiller and P. Sullivan, IMAGE Wind Data Manipulation Update
 (Top)

August 4, 2010

S. Rose, U.S. Wind Potential and Penetration (Preliminary Results)

V. Krey, Revised Wind Energy Potentials in MESSAGE
L. Clarke, Representing Wind and Solar Energy in GCAM: Current Issues
D. van Vuuren, Renewables in IMAGE
D. Arent, Modeling Renewable Energy Technologies in IAMs for
Mitigating Future Climate Change (Close)
J. Weyant, Summary