San Francisco Chronicle, May 26, 1894, p. 4, c. 2
in trials after the strike, ARU lawyers would attempt to paint Baldwin as a pro-Southern Pacific marshall.
examination of Baldwin, Nov. 15, 1894, box 211, f. 5, NARA case 3059.
in the District Court, in the Northern District of California, Dec. 4, 1894, box 211, f. 1, Pullman Strike.
Almont Lindsey, The Pullman Strike: The Story of a Unique Experiment and of a Great Labor Upheaval (Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press, 1942).
for wage reductions, U.S. Strike Commission, Chicago Strike, xxxiii.
Hovenkamp, Enterprise and American Law, 208-11, 218-19.
Dubofsky, "Federal Judiciary," 159-75.
Judge Marshall Harlan quoted in Dubofsky, "Federal Judiciary," 170.
Ames et al. v. Union Pacific Ry. et al., 14-15.
Quoted in Dubofsky, "Federal Judiciary," 163
Toledo, A.A. and N.M. Ry. Co. v. Pennsylvania Co. et al., 739.