Sec. 5, Act of July 1, 1862, Statutes at Large 12 (1863): 489.
The case was United States v. Union Pacific Railroad Company, 91 U.S. 72
23 L. Ed. 224.
1875 U.S. LEXIS 1337.
2 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 2357.
1 Otto 72, Nov. 29, 1875, decided.
Testimony of Wm. Moorhead, Sept. 18, 1874 (2:30 P.M.) in the District Court of the United States, Eastern District of Pennsylvania, In the Matter of . . . Jay Cooke & Co, Bankrupts (Philadelphia: Allen, Lane & Scotts, 1875), 779, Fahnestock Papers.
Testimony of Leland Stanford, Aug. 10, 1887, PRC, 6:3161-200.
William Mahl, Memoir, L.E.M. 3, B-15, Mahl Papers.
Lavender, Great Persuader, 213-22.
See also Stanford to CPH, May 1, 1875, SC 33a, box 1, f. 16, Stanford Papers.
Testimony of CPH, PRC, 1:36.
Frank Bond to Andrew Pierce, Aug. 23, 1871, Statement of S.W. See, n.d, in Bond Statement, in Missouri, Kansas & Texas, received 20 Jan. 1872, from George Denison, containing statement by Frank Bond, Case II, no. 4, register One-378, Records of the Lands and Railroads Division, Department of Interior, RG 48, National Archives.