Jessica Fintzen: Representation of p-adic Groups
Definitions of representations
Let $p$ be a prime number and $F/\mathbb{Q}_ {p}$ or $F=\mathbb{F}_ {q}(\!(t)\!)$, $F\supseteq \mathscr{O}\ni \varpi$ and $\mathscr{O}/\varpi\mathscr{O}= \mathbb{F}_ {q}$.
We have $\operatorname{val}: F\rightarrow \mathbb{Z}\cup\{\infty\}$. Let $G=\underline{G}(F)$ where $\underline{G}$ is a connected reductive group over $F$.
Definition 1. A smooth representation of $G$ is a pair $(\pi,V)$ consisting of
- $V$: a $\mathbb{C}$-vector space
- $\pi: G\rightarrow \operatorname{Aut}(V)$ group homomorphism such that for any $v\in V$, there exists open compact subgroup $K$ of $G$, such that $\pi(k)v=v$ for any $k\in K, v\in V$.
Remark 2. A basis of open neighborhood of $1\in \operatorname{GL}_ {n}(F)$ is given by $1+\varpi^{N}\operatorname{Mat}_ {n\times n}(\mathscr{O}).$
Example 3. Let $V=\mathbb{C}$ and $\operatorname{triv}:=\pi: \mathbb{G}\rightarrow 1\in \mathbb{C}^{\times}=\operatorname{Aut}(V)$, called trivial representation.
Definition 4. Let $P=M\ltimes N$ be a parabolic subgroup with Levi subgroup $M$ and unipotent radical $N$ and a smooth representation $(\sigma,V_ {\sigma})$ of $M$. Then the parabolic induction $(\operatorname{Ind}_ {P}^{G}\sigma, \operatorname{Ind}_ {P}^{G} V_ {\sigma})$ is the smooth representation $$\operatorname{Ind}_ {P}^{G}V_ {\sigma}:=\{f: G\rightarrow V_ {\sigma}: f(mng)=\sigma(m)f(g), \forall m\in M,n\in N,g\in G; \exists K_ {f}\subseteq G \text{ compact open, s.t. }f(gk)=f(g)\quad \forall k\in K_ {f}\}.$$
Definition 5. A supercuspidal representation $(\pi, V)$ of $G$ is an irreducible smooth representation such that $(\pi,V)$ does not embed into any $(\operatorname{Ind}_ {P}^{G}\sigma, \operatorname{Ind}_ {P}^{G}V_ {\sigma})$ for any proper parabolic subgroup $P=M\ltimes N$ and any irreducible smooth representation $(\sigma,V_ {\sigma})$ of $M$.
Fact: let $(\pi,V)$ be an irreducible representation of $p$-adic group $G$. Then there exists $P=M\ltimes N\subseteq G$, and a supercuspidal representation $(\sigma, V_ {\sigma})$ of $M$, such that $(\pi,V)\hookrightarrow (\operatorname{Ind}_ {P}^{G}\sigma, \operatorname{Ind}_ {P}^{G}V_ {\sigma}).$
Question 1: How to construct supercuspidal representations? In this talk, we don’t discuss this part.
Folklore conjecture: every supercuspidal representation is of the form $\operatorname{c-ind}_ {K}^{G}\rho$ where $K\subset G$ is compact-modulo-center open subgroup and $f$ is an irreducible representation of $K$ ( in particular $\text{dim}V_ {\rho}<\infty$ ).
Known with explicit $(K,\rho)$:
- $\operatorname{GL}_ {n}$,
- classical groups, $p\neq 2$,
- inner forms of $\operatorname{GL}_ {n}$,
- $G$ splits over a tame extension $E/F$ and $p$ does not divide the order of Weyl group associated to $G$.
Remark 6. Over mod $\ell$ coefficients, cuspidal (not sub of any proper parabolic induction) and supercuspidal (not subquotient of any proper parabolic induction) are different notions.
Bernstein representation
Let $\operatorname{Rep}(G)$ be the category of smooth representations of $G$. Then $$\operatorname{Rep}(G)=\prod_ {\{(M,\sigma)\}/\sim}\operatorname{Rep}(G)_ {[M,\sigma]}$$ where
- $M$ is a levi and $\sigma$ is a supercuspidal representation of $M$,
- and $(M,\sigma)\sim (gMg^{-1},\sigma^{g}\otimes\chi)$, with $\chi$ unramified (i.e. trivial on all compact subgroups) character $gMg^{-1}\rightarrow \mathbb{C}^{\times}$,
- $\operatorname{Rep}(G)_ {[M,\sigma]}$ consists of all representations of $G$, all of whose irreducible subquotients are contained in $\operatorname{Ind}_ {P^{\prime}}^{G} V_ {\sigma^{\prime}}$ with $P^{\prime}=M^{\prime}N^{\prime}$ and $(M^{\prime},\sigma^{\prime})\sim (M,\sigma).$
Example 7. For $G=\operatorname{SL}(F)$,
- $M=G$, and $\operatorname{Rep}(G)_ {[G,\sigma]} = \{\sigma,\sigma\oplus\sigma,\dots\}.$
- $M=T=\begin{pmatrix}\ast & 0 \\ 0 &\ast\end{pmatrix}$, $B=\begin{pmatrix}\ast & \ast \\ 0 &\ast\end{pmatrix},$ $\operatorname{Rep}(G)_ {[T,\text{triv}]}\ni \operatorname{Ind}_ {B}^{G}(\text{triv}), \text{triv},\mathrm{St}$. This is called principal block. $$0\rightarrow \text{triv} \rightarrow \operatorname{Ind}_ {B}^{G}(\text{triv})\rightarrow \mathrm{St}\rightarrow 1.$$
Question 2: Understand $\operatorname{Rep}(G)_ {[M,\sigma]}$?
Rough answer:
- Marris 1993,
- Bushnell-Kutzko 1998,
- Yu 2001, Fintzen 2001,
- Kim-Yu 2017,
- Kim 2007,
- Fintzen 2021,
- Adler-Fintzen-Mishoa-Ohara 2024
- $\operatorname{Rep}(G)_ {[M,\sigma]} \cong \operatorname{Mod}\text{-}(\mathscr{H}_ {\text{aff}}(W_ {\text{aff}},q)\rtimes \mathbb{C}[\Omega,\mu])$,
- $\operatorname{Rep}(G)_ {[M,\sigma]}\cong \operatorname{Rep}(G^{\circ})_ {[M^{\circ}, \sigma^{\circ}]}$, where $\sigma^{\circ}$ is of depth-zero, i.e. corresponds to representations of finite groups of Lie groups.
Bruhat-Tits theory
Suppose that $G$ is split to simplify the situation.
Moy-Prasad filtration
Definition 8. A BT triple is a triple $x=(T,\{X_ {\alpha}\}_ {\alpha\in\Phi(G,T)},\chi_ {\text{BT}})$
- $T\subseteq G$ is a split maximal torus, e.g. $g\begin{pmatrix} \ast & & 0 \\ &\ddots & \\ 0 & &\ast \end{pmatrix}g^{-1}\subseteq \operatorname{GL}_ {n}(F)$,
- $X_ {\alpha}\in \operatorname{Lie}(G)_ {\alpha}$ and $\{X_ {\alpha}\}$ form a Chevalley system,
- $\chi_ {\text{BT}}\in \mathbb{X}_ {\ast}(T)\otimes_ {\mathbb{Z}}\mathbb{R}:=\operatorname{Hom}(\mathbb{G}_ {m},T)=\operatorname{Hom}_ {F}(F^{\times},T).$
Fix a BT-triple $x$.
Now we construct Moy-Prasad filtration for tori $T$. $$T_ {0}:=\{t\in T: \operatorname{val}(\chi(t))=0:\forall \chi\in \mathbb{X}^{\ast}(T)\}=\text{maximal compact subgroup of $T$},$$ $$T_ {r}:=\{t\in T_ {0}: \text{val}(\chi(t)-1)\geq r,\forall \chi\in \mathbb{X}^{\ast}(T)\}.$$
Now we construct Moy-Prasad filtration for root groups $U_ {\alpha}\subseteq G$.
Choose $x_ {\alpha}:F\xrightarrow{\cong}U_ {\alpha}\subseteq G ,$ which induces $\operatorname{Lie}(x_ {\alpha}): F\xrightarrow{\cong}\operatorname{Lie}(U_ {\alpha})=(\operatorname{Lie}(G))_ {\alpha}$ sending $1$ to $X_ {\alpha}$ fixed in the BT triple. Then for $r\in \mathbb{R}_ {\geq 0},$ we set $$U_ {\alpha,x,r}:=x_ {\alpha}(\varpi^{\lceil r-\alpha(\chi_ {\text{BT}})\rceil}\mathscr{O}),$$ where $\alpha(\chi_ {\text{BT}})\in \operatorname{Hom}(\mathbb{G}_ {m},\mathbb{G}_ {m})\otimes_ {\mathbb{Z}}\mathbb{R}=\mathbb{R}.$
Example 9. Take $G=\operatorname{SL}_ {2}(F)$,
- $x_ {1}=(T=\begin{pmatrix} \ast & 0 \\ 0 & \ast \end{pmatrix}, \{X_ {\alpha}= \begin{pmatrix} 0 & 1 \\ 0 & 0 \end{pmatrix},X_ {-\alpha}=\begin{pmatrix} 0 & 0 \\ 1 & 0 \end{pmatrix}\},\chi_ {\text{BT}}=0)$.
The root $$\alpha: \begin{pmatrix} t & 0 \\ 0 & t^{-1} \end{pmatrix}\mapsto t^{2}.$$ Then $$x_ {\alpha}: x\mapsto \begin{pmatrix} 1 & x \\ 0 & 1 \end{pmatrix}$$ and $$U_ {\alpha,x,r}=\begin{pmatrix} 1 & \varpi^{\lceil r \rceil}\mathscr{O} \\ 0 & 1 \end{pmatrix}$$ and $$ U_ {-\alpha,x,r}=\begin{pmatrix} 1 & 0\\ \varpi^{\lceil r \rceil}\mathscr{O} & 1 \end{pmatrix} $$
- $x_ {2}:=(T, \{X_ {\alpha},X_ {-\alpha}\}, \chi_ {\text{BT}}=\frac{1}{4}\alpha^{\vee})$. Then $\alpha(\chi_ {\text{BT}})=\frac{1}{2}.$ Then $$U_ {\alpha,x,r}=\begin{pmatrix} 1 & \varpi^{\lceil r-\frac{1}{2}\rceil}\mathscr{O} \\ 0 & 1 \end{pmatrix}$$ and $$U_ {\alpha,x,r}=\begin{pmatrix} 1 & 0 \\ \varpi^{\lceil r+\frac{1}{2}\rceil}\mathscr{O} & 1 \end{pmatrix}$$
Now we can define Moy-Prasad filtration. For $r\in \mathbb{R}_ {\geq 0}$, define $$G_ {x,r}:=\langle T_ {r},U_ {\alpha,x,r}:\alpha\in \Phi(G,T) \rangle.$$
Example 10. For $G=\operatorname{SL}_ {2}(F)$,
-
$G_ {x_ {1},0}=\operatorname{SL}_ {2}(\mathscr{O})$, and $G_ {x,r}= \begin{pmatrix} 1+\varpi^{\lceil r\rceil}\mathscr{O} & \varpi^{\lceil r\rceil}\mathscr{O} \\ \varpi^{\lceil r\rceil}\mathscr{O} & 1+\varpi^{\lceil r\rceil}\mathscr{O} \end{pmatrix}$
-
$G_ {x_ {2},0}=\begin{pmatrix} \mathscr{O} & \mathscr{O} \\ \varpi \mathscr{O} & \mathscr{O} \end{pmatrix}$ and similarly for $G_ {x,r}$.
$G_ {x,r+}:=\cup_ {s>r}G_ {x,s}$. The group $G_ {x,0}$ is called parahoric.
Nice properties:
- $G_ {x,r}$ is a normal subgroup of $G_ {x,0}$,
- $G_ {x,0}/G_ {x,0+}\cong \mathbb{F}_ {q}\text{-points of a reductive group}$.
- $[G_ {x,r},G_ {x,s}]\subseteq G_ {x,r+s}$.
Example 11. Take $G=\operatorname{SL}_ {2}$ as before. Then $G_ {x_ {1},0}/G_ {x_ {1},0+}= \operatorname{SL}_ {2}(\mathbb{F}_ {q})$ and $G_ {x_ {2},0}/G_ {x_ {2},0+}\cong \begin{pmatrix} \mathbb{F}_ {q} & 0 \\ 0 & \mathbb{F}_ {q} \end{pmatrix}_ {\text{det}=1}$
Bruhat-Tits Building (non-traditional definition)
Definition 12. The (reduced) Bruhat-Tits buiding $\mathscr{B}(G,F)$ is as a set $\{\text{BT triples}\}/\sim$, where $x_ {1}\sim x_ {2}$ if and only if $G_ {x_ {1},r}=G_ {x_ {2},r}$ for any $r\geq 0$. Therefore, we can write $G_ {x,r}$ for $x\in \mathscr{B}(G,F)$.
Properties:
- $G$ acts on $\mathscr{B}(G,F)$ such that for any $x\in \mathscr{B}(G,F)$, $G_ {gx,r}=gG_ {x,r}g^{-1}$ for any $g\in G$.
- $\mathscr{B}(G,F)$ can be equipped with a polysimplicial structure such that for $x,y\in \mathscr{B}(G,T)$, $x,y$ are in the interior of the same polysimplex if and only if $G_ {x,0}=G_ {y,0}$.
Remark 13. Fix $T$, let $\mathscr{A}(T,F):=(T,\{X_ {\alpha}\},\chi_ {\text{BT}})/\sim$ with $T$ fixed, then $\mathscr{A}(T,F)=(T,\{X_ {\alpha}\},\chi_ {\text{BT}})/\sim$ with $T$ and $X_ {\alpha}$ fixed, and $\chi_ {\text{BT},1}\sim \chi_ {\text{BT},2}$ if and only if $$\chi_ {\text{BT},1}-\chi_ {\text{BT},2}\in \mathbb{X}_ {\ast}(Z(G))\otimes\mathbb{R}.$$
In particular, one can equip $\mathscr{A}(T,F)$ with structure of an affine space over $\mathbb{X}_ {\ast}(T)\otimes_ {\mathbb{Z}}\mathbb{R}/X_ {\ast}(Z(G))\otimes_ {\mathbb{Z}}\mathbb{R}$.
Definition 14. Let $(\pi,V)$ be an irreducible smooth representation of $p$-adic group $G$. The depth of $(\pi,V)$ is the smallest $r\in \mathbb{R}_ {\geq 0}$ such that $V^{G_ {x,r+}}\neq 0$ for some $x\in \mathscr{B}(G,F)$.
Theorem 15 (Moy-Prasad). Let $x\in \mathscr{B}(G,F)$ be a vertex, $G_ {x}:=\operatorname{Stab}_ {G}(x)$. Let $(\rho,V_ {\rho})$ be an irreducible representation of $G_ {x}$, such that
- $\rho|_ {G_ {x,0+}}=\text{triv}$,
- $\rho|_ {G_ {x,0}}$ is a cuspidal representation of $G_ {x,0}/G_ {x,0+}$. Then $\text{c-ind}_ {G_ {x}}^{G}\rho$ is an irreducible supercuspidal representation of $G$ of depth 0 and all depth 0 supercuspidal representations arise in this way.
Remark 16. If $G$ is simply connected, then $G_ {x}=G_ {x,0}$.
Construction of supercuspidal representations à la Yu
Assume that $G$ splits over a tame extension.
Input:
- $G^ {0}\subsetneq G^ {1}\subsetneq \cdots \subsetneq G^{n}=G$ tame twisted Levi subgroups (i.e. $\underline{G}^{i}\times E \subsetneq \underline{G}^{i+1}\times E$ is a Levi subgroup for some tame extension $E/F$), such that $Z(G^{0})/Z(G)$ is anisotropic, i.e. compact.
- $x\in \mathscr{B}(G^{0},F)\subsetneq \mathscr{B}(G^{1},F)\subsetneq \cdots \subsetneq \mathscr{B}(G,F)$ such that $x$ is a vertex in $\mathscr{B}(G^{0},F)$.
- $0<r_ {0}<r_ {1}<\cdots <r_ {n-1}$ a sequence of positive real numbers,
- For $i=0,\dots, n-1$, $\phi_ {i}$ a $(G^{i+1},G^{i})$-genric character of $G^{i}$ of depth $r_ {i}$.
- $\rho^{0}$ an irreducible representation of $G_ {x}^{0}$ such that
- $\rho^{0}|_ {G_ {x,0+}^{0}}$ is trivial;
- $\rho^{0}|_ {G_ {x,0}^{0}}$ is a cuspidal representation of $G_ {x,0}^{0}/G_ {x,0+}^{0}$.
Example 17. For $G=\operatorname{SL}_ {2}(\mathbb{Q}_ {p})$, $p\neq 2$ and $n=1$, take $G^{0}=T^{\text{an}}=\{\begin{pmatrix} a & b \\ pb & a \end{pmatrix}\in \operatorname{SL}_ {2}(\mathbb{Q}_ {p}) \}$ and splits over $E=\mathbb{Q}_ {p}(\sqrt{p})$ (conjugate to $\begin{pmatrix} a + b\sqrt{p} & 0 \\ 0 & a-b\sqrt{p} \end{pmatrix}_ {\operatorname{det}=1}$).
We can take $x$ to be “the mid point” in the Bruhat-Tits tree.
For $r=\frac{1}{2}$, can take $\phi$ to be $$\begin{pmatrix} a & b \\ pb & a \end{pmatrix}\mapsto \varphi(2ab)$$ where $\varphi: \mathbb{Z}_ {p}\rightarrow \mathbb{C}^{\times }$ sending $p\mathbb{Z}_ {p}$ to $1$.
Construction:
- Take $\widetilde {K}:=G_ {x}^{0}G_ {x,\frac{r_ {0}}{2}}^{1}G_ {x,\frac{r_ {1}}{2}}^{1}\cdots G_ {x,\frac{r_ {n-1}}{2}}^{n},$
- Get $\widetilde {\rho}=\rho^{0}\otimes K$ a representation of $\widetilde {K}$, where
- $\rho^{0}:\widetilde {K}\rightarrow \widetilde {K}/G_ {x,0+}^{0}G_ {x,\frac{r_ {0}}{2}}^{1}G_ {x,\frac{r_ {1}}{2}}^{1}\cdots G_ {x,\frac{r_ {n-1}}{2}}^{n}\cong G_ {x}^{0}/G_ {x,0+}^{0}\rightarrow \operatorname{End}(V_ {\rho^{0}})$.
- $K=K^{\text{nt}}\otimes \epsilon^{\mathrm{FKS}}$, where the not-twisted $K$ is built from $\phi_ {i}$ via theory of Heisenberg-Weil representation and $\epsilon^{\mathrm{FKS}}:\widetilde {K}\rightarrow G_ {x}^{0}/G_ {x,0+}^{0}\rightarrow \{\pm 1\}\subset \mathbb{C}^{\times}$ is Fintzen-Kletha-Spice twist.
Theorem 18 (Yu 2001, Fintzen 2021 for $p\neq 2$, Fintzen-Schwein 2025 for $p=2,q\neq 2$). The representation $\operatorname{c-ind}_ {\widetilde {K} }^{G}\widetilde {\rho} $ is irreducible supercuspidal representation.
Theorem 19 (Kim 2007 for $p>>0$, $\text{char}(F)=0$, Fintzen 2021). If $p\nmid |\text{Wely group of $G$}|$, then all supercuspidal representations arise in this way.
Hakim-Murnaghan and Kaletha show which data give same ouput.
Remark 20. Same for $\overline{\mathbb{F}_ {\ell}}$-representations for $\ell\neq p$.
Given $M\subseteq G$ a Levi subgroup and $(\sigma,V_ {\sigma})$ a supercuspidal representation of $M$.
Definition 21. A pair $(K,\rho)$ consisting of a compact open subgroup $K\subseteq G$ and an irreducible representation $(\rho,V_ {\rho})$ of $K$ is an $[M,\sigma]$-type, if for all irreducible representation $(\pi,V)$ of $G$, the following are equivariant:
- $\pi\in \operatorname{Rep}(G)_ {[M,\sigma]}$,
- $\rho\hookrightarrow \rho|_ {K}$, i.e. $\operatorname{Hom}_ {G}(\operatorname{c-ind}_ {K}^{G}\rho,\pi)\cong \operatorname{Hom}_ {K}(\rho,\pi)\neq 0$.
Example 22. For $G=\operatorname{SL}_ {2}(F)$, $T=\begin{pmatrix}\ast & 0 \\ 0 & \ast \end{pmatrix}$, $(I_ {w},\text{triv})$ is a $[T,\text{triv}]$-type, where $I_ {w}$ is the standard Iwahori subgroup.
Theorem 23 (Bushnell-Kuszko,1998). If $(K,\rho)$ is an $[M,\sigma]$-type, then $$\operatorname{Rep}(G)_ {[M,\sigma]}\cong \operatorname{Mod}\text{-}\mathscr{H}(G,K,\rho),$$ where the Hecke algebra $$\mathscr{H}(G,K,\rho) = \{f: G\rightarrow \operatorname{End}(V_ {\rho}): f(kgk^{\prime})=\rho(k)f(g)\rho(k^{\prime}),\forall k,k^{\prime}\in K, g\in G, f\, \text{compactly supported}\}$$ equipped with convolution product.
It is easy to see that $\mathscr{H}(G,K,\rho)\cong \operatorname{End}_ {G}(\operatorname{c-ind}_ {K}^{G}\rho)$.
Example 24. Take $G=\operatorname{SL}_ {2}(F)$,
- $M=G$, and $\sigma= \operatorname{c-ind}_ {\widetilde {K}^{G}\rho}$, then $\mathscr{H}(G,\widetilde {K},\rho)\cong \operatorname{End}(\operatorname{c-ind}_ {\widetilde {K}^{G}\rho})$ and $(\widetilde {K},\rho)$ is a type for $[G,\sigma]$.
- Take $[T,\sigma=\text{triv}]$, then $\mathscr{H}(G,I_ {w},\text{triv})\cong \mathscr{H}_ {\text{aff}}(W_ {\text{aff}},q)$ is the Iwahori-Hecke algebra.
Theorem 25 (Kim-Yu 2017, Fintzen 2021). Assume $G$ splits over a tame extension as before. A construction analagous to Yu’s construction (but with more general input) yields an $[M,\sigma]$-type. If $p\nmid |\text{Weyl group of $G$}|$, then for any $[M,\sigma]$, there exists a type as above.
Fix an input $(G^{0}\subsetneq G^{1}\subsetneq \cdots\subsetneq G, x,\{r_ {i}\}, \{\phi_ {i}\}, \rho^{0})$, one gets a type $(K,\rho)$, $x = \mathscr{B}(M^{0},F)\subseteq \mathscr{B}(G^{0},F)$ a vertex, $M=\operatorname{Cent}(Z_ {\text{split}}(M^{0}))$.
Fact: $\operatorname{supp}(\mathscr{H}(G,K,\rho)) = K\operatorname{supp}(\mathscr{H}(G^{0}, K^{0},\rho^{0}))K$, where $K^{0}=K\cap G^{0}$.
Theorem 26 (Adler-Fintzen-Mishra-Ohara, 2024). There exists a subgroup $N^{\heartsuit}\subseteq N_ {G^{0}}(M^{0},(M^{0}_ {x})_ {\text{cpt}})$, such that $$K^{0}\backslash \operatorname{supp}(\mathscr{H}(G^{0},K^{0},\rho^{0}))/K^{0}\xleftarrow {\cong}N^{\heartsuit}/N^{\heartsuit}\cong (M_ {x}^{0})_ {\text{cpt}}=:W^{\heartsuit}.$$
There is no obvious group structure on left hand side but the right hand side $W^{\heartsuit}$ has a natural group structure.
Theorem 27 (Adler-Fintzen-Mishra-Ohara, 2024). There is a representation $\widetilde {K}: N^{\heartsuit}(K\cap M)\rightarrow \operatorname{End}(V_ {K})$, such that $\widetilde {K}|_ {K\cap M}=K$, and there is an isomorphism of algebras $$J:\mathscr{H}(G^{0},K^{0},\rho^{0})\xrightarrow{\cong}\mathscr{H}(G,K,\rho),$$ given by the following:
- If $\varphi\in \mathscr{H}(G^{0},K^{0},\rho^{0})$ is supported on $K^{0}nK^{0}$ with $n\in N^{\heartsuit}$, then $J(\varphi)$ is supported on $KnK$, and $J(\varphi)(n) = d_ {n}\varphi(n)\otimes \widetilde {K}(n),$ where $d_ {n}=\sqrt{\frac{|K^{0}/nK^{0}n^{-1}\cap K^{0}|}{|K/nKn^{-1}\cap K|}}.$
Corollary 28. There is an equivalence $$\operatorname{Rep}(G)_ {[M,\sigma]}\cong \operatorname{Rep}(G^{\circ})_ {[M^{0},\sigma^{0}]},$$ where $[M,\sigma]$ corresponds to $(K,\rho)$.
Recall that $\rho\cong \rho^{0}\otimes K$ and $K^{0} = K\cap G^{0}=G_ {x,0}^{0}(M_ {x}^{0})_ {\text{cpt}}.$
Theorem 29. There is an isomorphism $W^{\heartsuit}\cong W(\rho)_ {\text{aff}}\rtimes \Omega(\rho)$, and $\mathscr{H}(G,K,\rho) \cong \mathscr{H}_ {\text{aff}}((N(\rho))_ {\text{aff}}, \{qs\})\rtimes \mathbb{C}[\Omega(\rho),\mu]$ for some 2-cocycle $\mu$ and some $qs\in \mathbb{Q}_ {>1}$, and $s\in $set of simple refecltions of $W(\rho)_ {\text{aff}}$.
How to reverse the construction?
Given $(\pi,V)$, we read off its depth $r$. Then $G_ {x,r}/G_ {x,r+}$ acts on $V^{G_ {x,r+}}$, and we read find some very nice $\phi^{1}$ corresponding to $x_ {1}\in \operatorname{Lie}(G)^{\ast}$, and take $G_ {1}:=\operatorname{Cent}(x_ {1})$. This procedure can be continued in a suitable sense and gives a sequence.